Why Does Work Have Positive and Negative Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalar Work
AI Thread Summary
Work is defined as a scalar quantity, represented by the dot product of force and distance, which can have positive or negative values. The work done on a spring is positive, while the work done by the spring is negative, reflecting the transfer of energy between the two. This distinction arises from Newton's third law, where the forces involved act in opposite directions, resulting in the work being equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. Scalars do not have direction but can possess positive or negative values, similar to other scalar quantities like temperature or altitude. The discussion emphasizes that while work itself is scalar, the context of energy transfer gives it a directional aspect.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Fact: Being the dot product of force and distance, work is a scalar. Fragment from my textbook: The work done on the spring is ##\frac{1}{2}kx^2##, and so the work done by the spring is ##-\frac{1}{2}kx^2##.

Homework Equations


##W = f \cdot d ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought scalars don't have directions. Why is the "work done on" positive, while the "work done by" is negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calpalned said:

Homework Statement


Fact: Being the dot product of force and distance, work is a scalar. Fragment from my textbook: The work done on the spring is ##\frac{1}{2}kx^2##, and so the work done by the spring is ##-\frac{1}{2}kx^2##.

Homework Equations


##W = f \cdot d ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought scalars don't have directions. Why is the "work done on" positive, while the "work done by" is negative?
Scalars don't have direction but they do have + or - signs!
 
rude man said:
Scalars don't have direction but they do have + or - signs!

rude man said:
Scalars don't have direction but they do have + or - signs!

I thought that scalars are magnitudes (aka absolute values)...
 
Calpalned said:
I thought that scalars are magnitudes (aka absolute values)...
It's the "aka" part of your statement that's erroneous.

The magnitude of a vector is an absolute value and scalars are often described as having magnitude, but not direction.

That's not to say that all magnitudes are absolute values.
 
Calpalned said:
I thought that scalars are magnitudes (aka absolute values)...
Not so. Temperature in Celsius for example is a scalar. It can be + or -, right? Or altitude - can be above or below sea level. Etc.
 
  • Like
Likes Calpalned
Calpalned said:

Homework Statement


Fact: Being the dot product of force and distance, work is a scalar. Fragment from my textbook: The work done on the spring is ##\frac{1}{2}kx^2##, and so the work done by the spring is ##-\frac{1}{2}kx^2##.

Homework Equations


##W = f \cdot d ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought scalars don't have directions. Why is the "work done on" positive, while the "work done by" is negative?
When you stretch a spring, you're doing work on the spring. According to Newton's third law, the spring exerts a force on you and therefore does work on you. The action and reaction forces point in opposite directions, but the displacement is the same in either case, so the work done on the spring by you and the work done by the spring on you are always negatives of each other.

Another way to look at it is that work is the transfer of energy. Energy goes from one thing to another, so in that sense there's a direction to work. It's like if I handed you a $1 bill. Money went from me to you, but you wouldn't say a $1 bill has a direction.
 
  • Like
Likes Calpalned
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top