Why Doesn't My Impulse-Change in Momentum Lab Show a Linear Relationship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Animal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a lab experiment measuring impulse and change in momentum using a cart and track setup. The data collected shows a significant deviation from the expected linear relationship between impulse and change in momentum, with the calculated slope and y-intercept being far from the ideal values of 1 and 0, respectively. Potential sources of error include the timing of velocity measurements relative to the impulse data and the need to ensure the line of best fit is forced through the origin. The participant is encouraged to verify their calculations and consider how the data was collected and analyzed. Overall, the experiment's data appears scattered, suggesting either measurement inaccuracies or calculation errors.
Animal
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Im doing an impulse-change in momentum lab, and somethings not adding up. My data is as follows:

Trial Vmin Vmax Mass Impulse
1 -.6447 .5766 .548 .9952
2 -.9044 .7803 .598 2.281
3 -.9416 .8343 .548 1.597
4 -.5553 .4425 .598 1.246
5 -1.054 .9313 .498 .9239
6 -.4706 .3409 .498 .3408

Then I figured Momentum by multiplying each Vmin and Vmax by its respective mass, then found the change in momentum by subtracting each Pmin from its respective Pmax. So the final data table looks like this:

Trial Change in Momentum Impulse
1 .6692 .9952
2 1.0074 2.281
3 .9732 1.597
4 .5966 1.246
5 .9886 .9239
6 .4041 .3408

The lab handout tells me that there should be some sort of linear relationship here, but when I graph it there's no rhyme or reason, let alone anything linear. Anyone know what I've done wrong?

Homework Equations


none, really, except that Momentum=m*v
Impulse was found with the computer program that we collected the data with

The Attempt at a Solution


its up there in part one, kind of integrated with everything else. sorry about the lack of organization
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Allright, I ran a best-fit line anyway and got a slope of 1.9 and a y intercept of -.23

The slope is supposed to be 1 and the y-int is supposed to be 0, since impulse=change in momentum. I would understand if there were a small error, but 1.9 is way off.

I switched axises (axes?) and got a slope of .277 and a y-int of .432.

Any ideas?
 
It would help if you told us what you did in the experiment. What was moving? What are the min and max velocities in your table? What produced the impulse and how was it measured?
 
Last edited:
OlderDan said:
It would help if you told us what you did in the experiment. What was moving? What are the min and max velocities in your table? What produced the impulse and how was it measured?

Sorry, it was a cart and track setup.


|force sensor|--elastic-cord-----o|cart|o <[motion detector]

We used a Vernier LabPro, and we found Impulse with the computer by finding the area under the curve on the graph.

we pushed the cart away from the force sensor and it rebounded.
 
is my data just really off, or is there some calculation problem that I'm making?
 
Animal said:
is my data just really off, or is there some calculation problem that I'm making?

So vmin and vmax are velocities before and after the elastic has turned the cart, and hopefully the times at which those data were recorded correspond to the ends of the interval you used to calculate the impulse. I don't know how you matched up the times of velocity measurement with your force curves, but that is a potential source of error. You appear to have computed your momentum changes correctly, so I guess your data is very scattered. Fitting the curve to a line is the bast you can do.

It would be appropriate in this case to do a fit that forces the line through the origin, since you expect zero change in momentum to correspond to zero impulse. I'm not sure if your calculator or computer program gives you that option, but if your fitted curve is far from the origin and you have the option to force it to the origin you probably want to use it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top