Why Don't Gas Mixtures Segregate in a Sealed Container?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mviswanathan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Mixed
AI Thread Summary
A gas mixture of 50% C4H10 and 50% air will not segregate into layers in a sealed container due to the constant movement of gas molecules. The discussion raises concerns about potential segregation in a burner system using this mixture, particularly when the gas is stagnant in the piping. It is suggested that while gravity can separate components in a centrifuge, under normal conditions, continuous molecular motion prevents segregation. The possibility of segregation may arise at very low absolute pressures, but the concern is deemed less significant at near atmospheric pressure. Overall, the understanding is that under typical conditions, the mixture should remain homogeneous.
mviswanathan
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
As I understand, a gas mixture, say 50% C4H10 and 50% Air, will not segregate and form layers with the heavier gas at the bottom even in a sealed container. This is due to the constant movement of gas molecules.

Is my understanding correct?

Does this depend on pressure?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct
One way to separate it is to 'increase gravity', by spinning the gas in a centrifuge you can force the heavier gas to the outside and separate them.
 
So, does it mean that the gravity can separate the mixture components in layers?

Well, the context is like this:
We are trying to use Butane + Air mixture in place of Natural Gas in a burner and fire the mixture with additional air. That looks ok.
But worried that when we put of the system with the stagnat gas mixture in the piping, the elements could segragate and form layers with the Butane at the bottom. Going by the theory that, the pressure of the gas on the walls of the container is due to continuous bombardment of the gas molecules, there will be continuous mixing of the mixure components and the segregation will not take place.
May be the segregation could occur at very low absolute pressures? Then, how low pressure?
Is the worry justified at near atmospheric pressure range?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top