Why Don't Gas Particles Get Pulled Towards Earth If Gravity is Constant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rishch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
Gas particles are influenced by gravity but do not fall to Earth due to collisions with other particles, which create a balance of forces. The discussion also explores the concept of equilibrium among three non-coplanar forces, concluding that they cannot sum to zero without being linearly dependent. This means that if the forces are not coplanar, they cannot be orthogonal and must instead span a three-dimensional space. The participants clarify that the initial assertion regarding orthogonality was incorrect, emphasizing the importance of understanding vector relationships in physics. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of force interactions in gas behavior and equilibrium.
rishch
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Can three concurrent, non co planar forces be in equilibrium? also,

If g is a constant then why don't gas particles get accelerated towards the Earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say no, but it's the sort of question that demands a proof accompanying the answer... I would suggest that three vectors which are not all coplanar must also be orthogonal, and therefore there is no way that they can sum to zero. To answer your second question, gas particles are subject to the force of gravity but there are other forces which stop all the molecules from falling onto the surface (collisions).
 
MikeyW said:
I would say no, but it's the sort of question that demands a proof accompanying the answer... I would suggest that three vectors which are not all coplanar must also be orthogonal, and therefore there is no way that they can sum to zero.

They don't have to be orthogonal. But as you say, they cannot sum to zero. If they did, they would be linearly dependent. And then, any linear combination of the three could be reduced to a linear combination of two of them. Therefore, they would only span a plane, or less, which is against the assumption of not being co-planar.
 
A much better way of saying it! Thanks, orthogonal was the wrong word.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top