Why dont we feel earths rotation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puneeth423
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
Earth rotates once every 24 hours, with points on the equator moving at approximately 1,667 km/hr. Despite this high speed, we do not feel it because the atmosphere moves with the planet, creating no relative wind. Additionally, the force of gravity acts vertically downward, maintaining a consistent experience of weight. The effects of inertia further contribute to our inability to perceive this motion. Overall, the combination of these factors explains why we do not feel the Earth's rotation.
Puneeth423
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Earth is completing one rotation in one day i.e, in 24 hours. Its equator length is around 40,000 km. Every point on equator is moving with a speed of 40,000/24 i.e, 1667 km/hr. Why don't we feel that speed even though we are moving at such high speeds when we are at equator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't get blown over because the air moves with the earth. We weigh a tiny bit less at the equator because of the spin. Gravity continues to act vertically downwards, so we notice no changes in the forces on us because there are no changes in magnitude or direction.
 
Magic effects of inertia :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top