Why Earth is Bulged at the Equator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himal kharel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Equator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the reasons for Earth's equatorial bulge, with participants debating explanations that avoid mentioning centrifugal force. One explanation suggests that inertia causes the equatorial region to bulge as it moves, while others express confusion over the restriction on using centrifugal force in their reasoning. Some argue that the gravitational force is less at the equator, contradicting claims that more gravitational force leads to a bulge. The conversation highlights the challenge of providing a satisfactory explanation without referencing the forbidden concepts. Ultimately, the participants struggle to reconcile the OP's constraints with the scientific principles involved.
Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Why is Earth bulged at equator ?
Please don't explain in terms of centrifugal force
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about Newton's First Law? Objects in motion tend to keep moving in a straight line, so the part of the Earth that is at the equator has a tendency to keep moving straight, rather than in a circle, causing an outward bulge.
 
That explanation has been forbidden by the OP. I don't know, how to answer the question, when I'm forbidden to answer the way it is. So I don't answer at all!:devil:
 
The explanation given above does not mention centrifugal force -- it correctly describes the effect in terms of inertia!
 
Himal kharel said:
Why is Earth bulged at equator ?
Please don't explain in terms of centrifugal force

I'm confused here. A is the cause of B, and you want us to explain B without referring to A...ummm...so you want us to make up an explanation? Something involving supernatural beings?
 
olivermsun said:
The explanation given above does not mention centrifugal force -- it correctly describes the effect in terms of inertia!

That's the same thing; he merely avoided the term that the OP didn't want to hear. :wink:
However, perhaps the OP simply doesn't want to hear about fictive centrifugal force. In that case all replies are conform. :smile:
 
vanhees71 said:
That explanation has been forbidden by the OP. I don't know, how to answer the question, when I'm forbidden to answer the way it is. So I don't answer at all!:devil:

as the distance from axis to the equator is more, The particles require more centripetal force which is to be provided by gravitational force . more gravitational force means
more particles must accumulate at equator.

I THINK THIS IS THE REASON.
 
Himal kharel said:
as the distance from axis to the equator is more, The particles require more centripetal force which is to be provided by gravitational force . more gravitational force means
more particles must accumulate at equator.

I THINK THIS IS THE REASON.
I'm afraid it isn't. The gravitational force is actually less at the equator than it is at the poles, and the gravitational force does not act in the direction of the equator.

Also, gravity is not the only force acting on the particles. Have you tried drawing a force diagram?
 
Why don't you want an explanation in terms of Centrifugal force?
 
  • #10
Why a nuclear plant produces energy ?
Please don't explain it in terms of E=mc2
?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top