Why, IF electrons really orbited atoms, would they lose energy?

AI Thread Summary
Electrons orbiting atoms would lose energy due to their changing electric fields, which result from their motion. As an electron moves, it creates a varying electric field that leads to the emission of light. This process is linked to the principles of electromagnetism, where a changing magnetic field induces a changing electric field. The discussion emphasizes that a moving charge alters the electric field at fixed points in space, confirming that the electron's position affects the field's strength and direction. Ultimately, this dynamic interaction explains why orbiting electrons would lose energy over time.
bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Why, IF electrons really orbited atoms, would they lose energy?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I realize they're meant to emit light. But why? I understand vaguely that the E field might be changing with time, since you have a changing magnetic flux... but where does the changing E field come from? Unless I guess it's just a self supporting process (changing B field *causes* changing E here...) - is that just what a light ray is??

Many Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw up a picture of a simple atom, like a hydrogen atom. Ignore the contribution from the atom core to the electric field.

Pick a random point and write down the electric field in that point, draw it again after half a period (For the orbiting electron).

Will the electric field be different in the two pictures.
 
Oh right, for sure. The electron is at a different distance from the point! Sorry!
 
A moving charge always produces a changing E field, that should be obvious. Take any fixed point P in space. At some time, the charge Q is at distance A from P. At some other time, Q is at distance B from P. Because A and B are different, the E field at P must also be different.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top