Why in hydrogen fusion are neutrinos ejected?

AI Thread Summary
In hydrogen fusion, neutrinos are ejected to conserve lepton number, specifically as electron-neutrinos, while positrons are also produced. In nuclear fission, neutrons can induce the splitting of a nucleus by disturbing its balance, leading to a probabilistic outcome where the nucleus elongates and eventually splits due to electromagnetic forces. The strong nuclear force, which is short-ranged and attractive, holds nucleons together, while electromagnetic forces are repulsive and act over longer distances. Mesons are not considered force carriers because they decay into gluons, which are the actual carriers of the strong force, but at hadronic energy scales, the interactions are better described by hadrons rather than individual quarks and gluons. The discussion highlights the complexities of nuclear interactions and the challenges in understanding them, especially for non-native English speakers.
thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering:

why in hydrogen fusion are neutrinos ejected?

why in fission does the neutron actually knock over neutrons out of atoms

the nucleon are held together in the nuceus by nuclear forces which over power electrostatic forces. But what actually generates these forces? Are electrons not in the nuclear because of their size and mass exerts little nuclear force?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


i) do preserve lepton number conservation, the neutrino emitted is an electron-neutrino, which carries no electric charge and electron lepton number +1. Emitted is also a positron, which carries electric charge +1 and electron lepton number -1. The protons (hydrogen nucleus) has no lepton number at all.

ii) are you referring to neutron induced fission? I can't even make up a correct sentence out of what you wrote.

http://library.thinkquest.org/17940/texts/fission/fission.html

The nucleus will be split into two halves and some free neutrons, the final result is probabilistic and the result will occur since it can occur (is more energetically favourable)

http://www.knutsford-scibar.co.uk/webimages/fission.jpg

iii) I think you are asking what is the attractive force that helds nucleons together, and that is the strong nuclear force:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force

http://aether.lbl.gov/elements/stellar/strong/strong.html

the concept is that only protons have EM-force, which is repulsive and infinite range, but quite weak in strength. Both protons and neutrons have attractive force called the nuclear force, which is strong but short ranged - only nearby neighbour nucleons feel that force.

Now look at the image on fission again, the incoming neutron will disturb the mother nucleus and make it elongated. The ratio of neighbours will decrease at the middle where it is thin, thus the electromagnetic force might take over and force the elongated nucleus to split in two + some neutrons. The yeild of daughter nuclei follows a distribution, here are some examples:

http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/atomic_and_nuclear_physics/4_7/4_7_1a.html

also the number of neutrons in the final state also vary, from 0 to quite many, like 6-8. The mean is around 4, depending on what mother nucleus you have and energy of incoming neutron.

electrons will undergo reactions with the protons in the nucleus when they are 'inside' the nucleus, this is called electron capture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Thank you very much.

One query I have at current, according to
http://aether.lbl.gov/elements/stellar/strong/strong.html

mesons are what hold the nucleons together/reason of the strong nuclear force, yet mesons are not force carriers

Isn't this because they decay in glueons which are the force carriers of strong nuclear force? I've been googling and without my luck, which is strange. Do you knwo the full story of mesons to glueons?

Thanks :)
 


Why are they NOT force carriers? It is easy to construct a theory of hadron interactions where they are the bosons responsible for interactions (see Chiral Perturbation Theory for instance, and meson exchange potential)

The thing is that at hadronic energy scales, QCD is not asymptotic free, so it is hard/meaningless to speak about quarks and gluons, what exists are hadrons; Mesons and Baryons.

Easy lectures:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9501/9501357v1.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_forceAdvanced lectures:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0210/0210398v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9501/9501357v1.pdfIt is a difference between the strong force (quarks and gluons) and the strong nuclear force (hadrons)

Mesons do NOT decay into gluons...

By the way, it is difficult to understand what you are saying sometimes, I guess English is not your native languange?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top