Why Is Capacitor Reactance 1/LC Instead of 1/sqrt(LC)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ben.tien
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
AI Thread Summary
The reactance of a capacitor is defined as 1/(2πfC), not 1/LC or 1/√(LC). This formula arises from the relationship between frequency and capacitance in AC circuits. When analyzing units, capacitance is expressed in Coulombs per volt, leading to the conclusion that reactance has units of ohms. The discussion clarifies that the correct formulation for capacitive reactance incorporates frequency, emphasizing the importance of understanding complex impedance. Overall, the confusion stems from misinterpretation of the reactance formula in relation to frequency and capacitance.
ben.tien
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I just want to know why the reactance of a capacitor is 1/LC rather than 1/\sqrt{}LC?


Homework Equations


2(pi)f = 1/sqrt(LC)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ben.tien said:

Homework Statement


I just want to know why the reactance of a capacitor is 1/LC rather than 1/\sqrt{}LC?

It's not. The magnitude of the reactance of a capacitor C is 1/(2πfC). Or, treating it as a complex impedance, the impedance is 1/(j2πfC).
 
gneill said:
It's not. The magnitude of the reactance of a capacitor C is 1/(2πfC). Or, treating it as a complex impedance, the impedance is 1/(j2πfC).

yeah my bad why is it that instead of 1/((2pif)^2)C)
 
ben.tien said:
yeah my bad why is it that instead of 1/((2pif)^2)C)

You can do a unit analysis. Capacitance is Coulombs per volt. So, ignoring unitless constants,

1/(f*C) ==> [T][V]/[Q]

but amps is charge per unit time, or [A] = [Q]/[T], so our units become

[T][V]/[Q] ==> [V]/[A] ==> Ohms.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top