Why is Computer Science Still Called Computer Science?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of computer science, with some arguing that it is neither a science nor strictly related to computers. This perspective references Edsger Dijkstra's assertion that computer science is more abstract and not solely about physical computers, similar to how astronomy is not just about telescopes. Participants debate the relevance of hardware and software in the field, suggesting that while advanced algorithms may lean more towards mathematics, they are foundational for programming. The conversation questions the necessity of changing the term "computer science," with some asserting that it accurately reflects the study of computation, which is primarily conducted using computers. There is acknowledgment that respected figures in the field have differing views, but the consensus leans towards maintaining the current nomenclature as it encapsulates the essence of the discipline.
Monster92
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Many people within the field say it's not a science nor a subject to do with computers. Then why keep it with the name computer science. What's stopping them from changing the darn name?
 
Technology news on Phys.org
What would you call it?
 
In what way is it not a science?
 
pdffile said:
Many people within the field say it's not a science nor a subject to do with computers.

Show us these people.
 
When you say it's not a subject to do with computers I assume you are referring to when Edsger Dijkstra said , "Computer science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes".

I think he was just trying to say that it's an abstract enough field where using some physical implementation of a computer isn't necessary to study it. Like most other sciences things are made simpler by removing irrelevant details and assuming a general case.
 
pdffile said:
Many people within the field say it's not a science nor a subject to do with computers. Then why keep it with the name computer science. What's stopping them from changing the darn name?

Computers have two aspects, hardware and software. You can't meaningfully or usefully have one without the other.

I think it would be possible to have a long and complex set of courses is computer science that has nothing to do directly with hardware or one focused on hardware without reference to software (but that would be harder if the courses were all to be helpful in some way) but you have to talk about one or the other. In what way then would the courses not be about computers?

True, study of advanced algorithms often has more to do with advanced math than directly with programming but it is the intellectual underpinning of advanced programming.

I think the people who make such a statement, if there are any, have it wrong.
 
pdffile said:
Many people within the field say it's not a science nor a subject to do with computers. Then why keep it with the name computer science. What's stopping them from changing the darn name?
There's really no point in changing the name...

Computer science is literally the study of computation. Today, practical computation is done using machines called "computers" so we call the study of computation "computer science." What's so bad about this that requires changing? Your efforts would be better spent convincing the world to switch from π to τ...
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
pdffile said:
Many people within the field say it's not a science nor a subject to do with computers.
Show us these people.
As David Snider has pointed out, Edsger Dijkstra had said that computer science is not really about the computers...

It has been such a long time ago that I can't be sure but I think Richard Trefler was my Logic and Computation professor at the University of Waterloo. In any case, that professor in the first day of that class described computer science as being "a strange amalgam of mathematics, science and engineering," and that it wasn't exactly anyone of those three.

So, in all fairness to the original poster, there are distinguished experts in this field who do claim what pdffile is saying...
 
Back
Top