Why is current constant in a series connection? AND fluid flow in pipe

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of current in series electrical connections and the analogy of fluid flow in pipes. Participants explore the implications of conservation laws in both contexts, addressing the behavior of charge in circuits and mass in fluid dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the conservation of charge implies that charge cannot accumulate at any point in a series circuit.
  • Others question whether fluid can accumulate and compress in a pipe, suggesting that while it may happen temporarily, steady state flow eventually results in equal inflow and outflow.
  • A participant introduces the idea that the behavior of charge in a circuit can be likened to fluid flow, noting that water is often treated as incompressible in this model.
  • One participant proposes a connection to Pauli's exclusion principle, suggesting that the behavior of electrons in a wire is influenced by the principle that no two electrons can occupy the same state simultaneously.
  • Another participant challenges this view, stating that there is no limit to the number of electrons in the conduction band of metals, and discusses the implications of self-capacitance in wires.
  • Discussion includes the notion that capacitors do not actually store charge in a way that leads to accumulation in a circuit, as charge flows in and out simultaneously.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the terminology used regarding charge storage in capacitors, indicating a need for clarity in definitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of charge accumulation in circuits and the behavior of fluids in pipes. There is no consensus on the implications of Pauli's exclusion principle in this context, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the terminology of charge storage in capacitors.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the treatment of fluids as incompressible is a simplification, and that real-world effects such as compressibility may alter flow dynamics, particularly during transient states. The discussion also highlights the complexities of charge behavior in conductive materials and the nuances of electrical components like capacitors.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of physics, electrical engineering, and fluid dynamics, particularly those exploring the principles of conservation laws and their applications in different contexts.

iampaul
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
My physics book explains that this is because of the conservation of charge and the fact that charge doesn't accumulate at a certain point.

Can someone please explain this in detail, especially the part where it says that charge can't accumulate.

Another question which i think is similar is the amount of mass flowing into and out of a pipe. My professor used the conservation of mass to show that the mass of fluid flowing into the pipe is equal to the mass flowing out. Isn't it possible that the fluid accumulates inside the pipe and gets compressed, so that the mass flowing out will be less than the mass flowing in?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible for material flowing into a pipe to compress so you, for a while, get less out than you put in. For a while. However, after a while the pressure of the trapped fluid gets high enough that the outflow = inflow once again. (An electrical component which acts like that would be considered "reactive" rather than ohmic - like a capacitor. I take it you are still just looking at DC loads?)

Now go look up compressability of water - it's so small that we usually treat water as uncompressable.

As far as the fluid-flow model for electric circuits is concerned, the "fluid" is always considered to be uncompressable. It's only a model ... a kind of metaphor to help you think about electric circuits. You will always be able to find some places where it doesn't work.
 
Isn't it possible that the fluid accumulates inside the pipe and gets compressed

You are perfectly right.
Conservation of mass in fluid dynamics usually includes a term that describes the mass stored inside of the system due to compressability or other effects. If this stored mass does not change with the time, then this is a special case called a steady state flow. And only in steady state flow the same amount of fluid is coming out of the pipe as the pipe is fed at the other end. You usually encounter unsteady flow effects on startup / shutdown of gas pipelines or when the flow is decreased / increased which usually needs a modification in the operating pressure.

In electricity startup and shutdown are so very fast, that you would not notice such effects unless you une scope and visualise the first milliseconds after you turned on he light or such. So we usually have a steady state flow here with the same flow (=current) throughout the series connection.
 
I may be wrong but I also understand this phenomena as being an experimental verifcation of pauli's exclusion principle that no two electrons can be in the same state at the same time and so if electrons leave a wire, there are only positions left to fill those spaces and no more. What goes in must come out, no more no less.
 
Veni2K said:
I may be wrong but I also understand this phenomena as being an experimental verifcation of pauli's exclusion principle that no two electrons can be in the same state at the same time and so if electrons leave a wire, there are only positions left to fill those spaces and no more. What goes in must come out, no more no less.

This is not true, at least for conduction in metals. There's no limit to the number of electrons in the conduction band. This is only kept very close to the number of metal ions, because a slight imbalance would produce a large electric field.

A small piece of wire would have a self-capacitance of about 1 pF.
This means that a piece of wire at 1V would have a charge of only 10^-12 Coulomb.
It would have only 6.2 million electrons less than a piece of wire at 0V.

1g = 1/63.5 mole of copper would have 6*10^23 /63.5 = about 10^22 copper atoms, and also about 10^22 electrons in the conducion band, so you only need to remove one electron in 1.6 * 10^15 to raise the potential with 1 volt. To remove in electron in 10^10 you'd need to put 160 kV on it.
This explains why the electron fluid appears nearly incompressible.
 
Wow nice replies
Thanks a lot!
 
So charge builds up on a capacitor... But if too much does, breakdown can allow that plugged up charge to continue.
 
Hi Jakeus314, welcome to Physics Forums!
Jakeus314 said:
So charge builds up on a capacitor... But if too much does, breakdown can allow that plugged up charge to continue.
While it often serves the purpose to speak of a capacitor as "storing charge", it is important to realize that it really does not. And in the context of the topic of this thread, it is doubly important to understand that a capacitor does not store up charge: as many electrons flow into the wire going to one side of the capacitor as simultaneously flow out from the other side into the rest of the series circuit. (*)

No charge gets delayed, waylaid, or squirrelled away and cannot be accounted for; there definitely is no "plugged up" charge anywhere in a series circuit (nor in any circuit, for that matter).

So why do we even say that capacitors store charge? That's a topic for another day... :wink:


(*) for this reason, we can speak of current flowing through a capacitor despite knowing there is an insulating layer at the centre of every capacitor
 
To speak of a current flowing, even in a wire, is to speak of a flow of charge flowing. It's more logical to say simply that there is a current. [Please forgive this short side-track.]
 
  • #10
To say storing a net charge would be wrong, but I'm sure they store charge... I'm not sure how picky I'm supposed to be when I respond to things here at PF.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K