Why is directional noise correlated noise?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CantorSet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise
AI Thread Summary
Directional noise in acoustics, such as from a ceiling fan, can cause correlated noise at multiple microphones due to the proximity of the noise source, not necessarily its directionality. The correlation between the noise signals at the microphones is influenced by the fact that both capture sound from the same point source, regardless of whether the noise is considered directional or omnidirectional. Mathematically, this noise can be treated as an additional signal source, complicating the analysis due to factors like multipath effects. It is also noted that the time delay variable in the equations should reflect the correct distances from the sound source to each microphone. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate signal processing in acoustics.
CantorSet
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

This is not a homework question but I question I have from reading a signals processing paper on acoustics.

Suppose there is a sound source in a room S(t) and two microphones X_1(t) and X_2(t). Then the standard acoustic propagation model has that

X_1(t) = a_1S(t-\tau_1)+n_1(t)

and

X_2(t) = a_2S(t-\tau_1)+n_2(t)

where a_i, \tau_i, n_i account for signal attenuation due to distance, time delay due to distance and noise, respectively.

But the paper says that if we have directional noise in the room (like a ceiling fan), then the noise at the two microphones is correlated, that is Corr(n_1(t),n_2(t)) \neq 0 [/itex]. <br /> <br /> But it seems to me the directionality isn&#039;t what&#039;s causing the correlation, but more the fact that the noise comes from a fan. That is, if we had an &quot;omnidirectional&quot; fan in the center of the room, the noise between the two microphones would still be correlated.<br /> <br /> Also, how does one mathematically represent noise that is directional?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In this context, I'd have to assume that by "directional", they simply mean the sound has one point source, as you say (and not that it is anisotropic!). On a side note, practically speaking there will be notable multipath, making things more difficult.

By the way, that Tau in the second equation should be tau sub 2, not Tau sub 1 (unless the microphones are the same distance from the sound source)

To mathematically describe noise that comes from a point source (described here as "directional"), treat it as if it were just another signal source term, albeit an undesirable one.
 
fleem said:
In this context, I'd have to assume that by "directional", they simply mean the sound has one point source, as you say (and not that it is anisotropic!). On a side note, practically speaking there will be notable multipath, making things more difficult.

By the way, that Tau in the second equation should be tau sub 2, not Tau sub 1 (unless the microphones are the same distance from the sound source)

To mathematically describe noise that comes from a point source (described here as "directional"), treat it as if it were just another signal source term, albeit an undesirable one.

Thanks for your help, Fleem.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top