CantorSet
- 44
- 0
Hi everyone,
This is not a homework question but I question I have from reading a signals processing paper on acoustics.
Suppose there is a sound source in a room S(t) and two microphones X_1(t) and X_2(t). Then the standard acoustic propagation model has that
X_1(t) = a_1S(t-\tau_1)+n_1(t)
and
X_2(t) = a_2S(t-\tau_1)+n_2(t)
where a_i, \tau_i, n_i account for signal attenuation due to distance, time delay due to distance and noise, respectively.
But the paper says that if we have directional noise in the room (like a ceiling fan), then the noise at the two microphones is correlated, that is Corr(n_1(t),n_2(t)) \neq 0 [/itex]. <br /> <br /> But it seems to me the directionality isn't what's causing the correlation, but more the fact that the noise comes from a fan. That is, if we had an "omnidirectional" fan in the center of the room, the noise between the two microphones would still be correlated.<br /> <br /> Also, how does one mathematically represent noise that is directional?
This is not a homework question but I question I have from reading a signals processing paper on acoustics.
Suppose there is a sound source in a room S(t) and two microphones X_1(t) and X_2(t). Then the standard acoustic propagation model has that
X_1(t) = a_1S(t-\tau_1)+n_1(t)
and
X_2(t) = a_2S(t-\tau_1)+n_2(t)
where a_i, \tau_i, n_i account for signal attenuation due to distance, time delay due to distance and noise, respectively.
But the paper says that if we have directional noise in the room (like a ceiling fan), then the noise at the two microphones is correlated, that is Corr(n_1(t),n_2(t)) \neq 0 [/itex]. <br /> <br /> But it seems to me the directionality isn't what's causing the correlation, but more the fact that the noise comes from a fan. That is, if we had an "omnidirectional" fan in the center of the room, the noise between the two microphones would still be correlated.<br /> <br /> Also, how does one mathematically represent noise that is directional?