Why Is Energy Conservation Not Valid in Moving Frames?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jahnavi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Spring
AI Thread Summary
Energy conservation does not hold in non-inertial frames due to the effects of acceleration. In the moving frame of block B, the initial kinetic energy of block C appears different, leading to confusion about energy conservation. The calculations show that while the total mechanical energy is calculated as 12J, this does not account for the non-inertial effects in block B's frame. The discrepancy arises because kinetic energy is frame-dependent, and in non-inertial frames, additional forces must be considered. Therefore, energy conservation principles are only valid in inertial frames.
Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


block.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



If I work in the lab frame I get the correct answer 4J .

But I do not understand why I do not get the correct answer if I work in the moving frame of block B .

After collision with block A , block B starts moving with 2m/s towards right .

Now in the frame of B , initial velocity of C is 2m/s towards left . Total initial mechanical energy = (1/2)(6)(22) = 12J .

In this frame spring will have maximum compression when C is at rest .That means maximum potential energy should be 12 J .

What is the mistake ?

The same problem arises if I work in the frame of block C .

So why is it that energy conservation is not holding true in the moving frames ?
 

Attachments

  • block.jpg
    block.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 674
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jahnavi said:
the moving frame of block B .
That will not be an inertial frame. KE appears different in different frames, even inertial ones, so in a non-inertial frame it will not be conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes Jahnavi
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top