Why is F a function of the similarity variable in dimensional analysis?

chewwy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Just read this, and got a bit confused when trying to do it...

Homework Statement



We have a diffusion equation situation with a semi-infinite rod, so:

\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial t} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 \theta }{\partial x^2 }

at infinity the rod is at some fixed temperature \theta_0, whilst at x=0, the temperature increases proportionally to time. write \theta(x,t)=\theta_0 + ktF.

explain with the help of dimensional analysis why F is a function only of the similarity variable \zeta = \frac{x}{\sqrt{\lambda t}}, and is independent of \theta_0 and k.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, right... so F must be dimensionless. but we have five variables here - \theta_0 , x, t, \lambda , k. how do we show \theta_0 and k aren't involved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can get to the fact that F must be a function of (\frac{\theta_0}{kt})^a (\frac{x}{\sqrt{\lambda t}})^b

but then I'm stuck...
 
this is almost certainly wrong but if \theta_0 has units of temperature and t has units seconds and k is of units Ks^{-1} then \frac{\theta_0}{kt} has units \frac{K}{Ks^{-1}s} which all cancel so that's just a constant, then you have

F = C \zeta^b with C a constant. Don't you?
 
latentcorpse said:
this is almost certainly wrong but if \theta_0 has units of temperature and t has units seconds and k is of units Ks^{-1} then \frac{\theta_0}{kt} has units \frac{K}{Ks^{-1}s} which all cancel so that's just a constant, then you have

F = C \zeta^b with C a constant. Don't you?

just because a quantity is dimensionless does not make it constant - it's a function of t!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top