Why is F=mg equivalent to gravitational force at different altitudes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the gravitational force calculation for a 70-kg student at sea level and at 40,000 feet above Earth's surface, yielding forces of 688.1 N and 686 N, respectively. The calculations demonstrate that the difference in gravitational force is minimal, less than 1%, highlighting the consistency of the second law of motion, F=mg. It is noted that while F=mg is an approximation near Earth's surface, gravitational acceleration (g) varies with distance and is influenced by factors such as Earth's shape and rotation. The slight discrepancies in force calculations can be attributed to changes in elevation and latitude, as g is not a constant. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the relationship between gravitational force and the variables affecting it.
stallion
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out why F=mg corresponds to question number two below.

First let's assume a object with mass 70kg and then calcutate the force of gravity in two different scenarios:

Determine the force of gravitational attraction between the Earth (m = 5.98 x 1024 kg) and a 70-kg physics student if the student is standing at sea level, a distance of 6.37 x 106 m from Earth's center.

Crunching the numbers yields 688.1 N

#2

Determine the force of gravitational attraction between the Earth (m = 5.98 x 1024 kg) and a 70-kg physics student if the student is in an airplane at 40000 feet above Earth's surface. This would place the student a distance of 6.38 x 106 m from Earth's center.

This yields: 686 Newtons at a distance of 40,000 feet.

Now use the 2nd law

F=mg (70kg)(9.8m/s^2) equals 686 N

Why is the 2nd Law calculation the same as the calculation at 40,000 feet?

I realize that this is a very small difference (less than 1%) between the two
numbers.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The 2nd law is the same in all inertial coordinate frames.
You can try using F=G*m*M/(r^2) (F=mg is approx. formula near the Earth's surface). Is there a noticable difference?
 
g changes with distance
 
yourdadonapogostick said:
g changes with distance

I know but what I am saying is that the force of gravity in #2 above (40,000) feet above the Earth is closer to f=mg than example one at sea level.

It would seem that the sea level calculation would be closer to f=mg.
 
The acceleration of gravity is not an absolute constant. It would be constant if the Earth's density was spherically symmetric and if the Earth were accurately a sphere and if there was not centrifugal component (earth not spinning). None of these 3 are true. In fact the variation in g is 1/2% from pole to equator at sea level. So though your 1/3% discrepancy can be accounted for by an elevation change, it can also be accounted for by a latitude change.
 
g is the acceleration experienced at the surface of the earth. That's how it's defined.
 
Back
Top