Why is H burning not a B+ decay

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The forgetful one
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cno cycle Decay
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
The forgetful one
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Hydrogen Burning in CNO cycle
Hello physics gurus out there.
Can someone please point me in the correct direction.
I am looking for reasons why Hydrogen burning is NOT considered to be B+ decay in the standard CNO cycle?

Thanks
The forgetful one
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apologies folks, I am just trying to learn this stuff.
The question I have is. If you consider the normal CNO cycle, why is H burning using this route not considered to be B+ decay limited.
 
This is a totally new area for me, I am doing it to try and stop my grey matter from going all mushy.
I think I should just let it go and do flower arranging instead. :-)
 
Just so you know: it's totally new for me too :oldeyes: ( but my background may be different)

However, I do like new areas of skills and knowledge. Not so sure about flower arranging, though ...
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: MathematicalPhysicist
It is not limited at low temperature, like star cores.
The reason is that positron decay is one particle process that happens at a speed independent on temperature or density, and in case of the CNO cycle nuclei (N-13 and O-15) in a few minutes. Whereas at those low temperatures the proton captures happen once in millions of years.
At high temperatures, like in exploding novae where accumulated protium explodes, CNO cycle is sped up until the proton capture can happen in minutes, and then positron decay does become a limiting step. This allows the branches of hot CNO cycle, like N-13 captures a second proton before decay and goes through O-14.