Why Is Inertia Crucial in Understanding Rotational Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Inertia is crucial in understanding rotational motion because it accounts for how mass is distributed relative to the axis of rotation, which differs from linear motion. The concept of moment of inertia incorporates the entire mass of an object while emphasizing its distribution, affecting rotational dynamics. This distinction is essential for accurate calculations in mechanics, as rotational and translational movements behave differently. Introductory texts, such as Grant R. Fowles' "Analytical Mechanics," provide foundational insights into these principles. Understanding moment of inertia is key to mastering the complexities of rotational motion.
ted.hb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why do we use inertia in rotational motion and not the whole mass of an object ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ted.hb said:
Why do we use inertia in rotational motion and not the whole mass of an object ?
What do you mean?

Do you mean rotational inertia? (Moment of inertia.) If so, realize that rotation and translation have their differences.
 
I remember any introductory text on the subject gives enough arguments and calculations!
Grant R. Fowles' Analytical mechanics is enough I think.
 
The moment of inertia is a calculation that does consider the whole mass of the object, as well as some information about the distribution of the mass about the rotational axis.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B A universe where Zeno is right and the law of inertia still holds
Replies
6
Views
624
I Newton's second law for rotations
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Resolve moment of inertia at an angle
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Explanation of parallel axis theorem
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Effects of External Torques on the Angular Momentum of Asymmetric Bodies
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Confused about the axis of rotation in rotational motion w/o slipping
Replies
10
Views
3K
B Rotation is absolute, linear motion is relative?
2
Replies
74
Views
4K
Why Do Different Objects Share Similar Moments of Inertia?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Moment of Inertia about an axis and Torque about a point
Replies
5
Views
3K
B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top