Why is it difficult to determine the center of a Newton's ring pattern?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ft92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Ring
AI Thread Summary
Determining the center of a Newton's ring pattern is challenging because the center is not a distinct point but rather an extended circle. While the diameter of the rings can be measured accurately, the radius is more difficult to pinpoint due to the small thickness of the rings. This small thickness complicates the identification of the exact center compared to measuring the distance to the edges of the rings. The difficulty arises from the nature of the interference pattern created by the rings, which blurs the center's definition. Accurate measurement relies on understanding these optical properties and their effects on the perceived center.
ft92
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
can anyone please explain to me why it's not possible to determine accurately the position of a centre of a Newton's ring pattern? I know that in a Newton's ring only the distance between one side of the ring to the other i.e. the diameter can be accurately determined, not the distance from the centre of the pattern i.e. the radius. why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say it's because what you have in the center is not a point, instead it's an extended circle. It's not impossible to locate the exact center of this circle, it's just more difficult than locating the marker on the other side of the same ring because these rings have small thickness, hence easier to pick the center on the thickness. I hope I convey my message well.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top