Why is it easier to measure overall structure of Andromeda Galaxy than

AI Thread Summary
Measuring the overall structure of the Andromeda Galaxy is easier than that of the Milky Way due to its visibility in light, allowing clear photographs, while the Milky Way's view is obstructed by dust and gas. Observers see the Milky Way edge-on, which complicates the perception of its spiral structure. In contrast, Andromeda can be viewed in its entirety, although its distance makes internal details harder to discern. The discussion highlights the challenges of observing the Milky Way's internal features due to interstellar gas. Overall, the visibility and positioning of Andromeda facilitate a clearer understanding of its structure compared to our own galaxy.
BFern
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is it easier to measure overall structure of Andromeda Galaxy than to measure Milky Way Galaxy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Originally posted by BFern
Why is it easier to measure overall structure of Andromeda Galaxy than to measure Milky Way Galaxy?
Because we can see the whole thing in visable light, and take neat photos, while it takes Radio and IR imaging to see through the dust and gasses blocking our view of most of our own Milky Way. Because we have to "see" our own galaxy edge-on, no neat spiral structure; we are in it.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap021021.html

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020719.html

Labguy
 
Last edited:
It's like holding a book right up to your face edge on, you can certain aspects of it's structure quite cleraly but you can't really see the bigger picture, add to this all the interstellar gas around the galactic nuclei which makes that region very difficult to observe.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums, BFern!

Note that it's easier to see Andromeda's overall structure, but harder to see the internal details (because it's so far away).
 
Originally posted by Phobos
Welcome to Physics Forums, BFern!

Note that it's easier to see Andromeda's overall structure, but harder to see the internal details (because it's so far away).
To add, and just for someone to look up if interested, somewhere on the web you can find an unbelievable photo of the giant elliptical galaxy M87. They say our Milky Way has about 150-200 Globular Clusters (I think more), but the photo of M87 shows good detail in the galaxy and ~10,000 (yes, ten thousand) globular clusters in the halo.

Labguy

EDIT: Here it is: (larger photo would be nice)
http://www.seds.org/messier/Jpg/m87.jpg From:
http://www.seds.org/messier/more/m-aat.html
A "keeper"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top