Why is it that acceleration has multiple components in SHM?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of acceleration in simple harmonic motion (SHM) and its representation through mathematical approximations, particularly in the context of internal combustion engines (ICE) and the slider-crank mechanism. Participants explore how different mathematical expansions, such as the binomial theorem, can lead to multiple components of acceleration and the implications of these choices on engine dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why acceleration in SHM has multiple components, suggesting that these arise from mathematical approximations like the binomial theorem used in deriving expressions for displacement in an ICE.
  • Another participant asserts that all models are wrong, but some are useful, implying a critique of the reliance on specific mathematical approaches.
  • A participant expresses difficulty in visualizing how inertial forces transform into various harmonic components due to irregular gas forces in a four-stroke engine cycle.
  • One participant requests clarification on how the binomial theorem is applied in the context of the discussion, seeking to understand the mathematical derivation better.
  • Another participant provides a detailed mathematical expansion of the cosine function using the binomial theorem and discusses how this leads to expressions for acceleration and inertial forces in an ICE, emphasizing the role of the chosen expansion method.
  • The same participant raises concerns about the implications of choosing different mathematical expansions on the derived magnitudes of forces and the balance in mechanical systems.
  • A participant shares a link to a related post on engine balance, suggesting further reading on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of mathematical approximations in modeling physical systems. There is no consensus on the best approach to expand the functions or the consequences of these choices on the understanding of acceleration in SHM and ICE.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of mathematical models in accurately capturing the complexities of physical systems, particularly in relation to the assumptions made during expansions and the potential for different interpretations of the results.

marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
I am trying to understand why in a SHM, the acceleration has multiple components(when actually we create such expressions mathematically by approximating the trigonometric expressions using the binomial theorem).I will explain what I mean to ask below with an example.

In a internal combustion engine(slider-crank mechanism), when I calculate the expression for displacement,I arrive at a expression like so:
$$s=r(cos \theta +\frac{l}{r}cos \phi)$$
where,s-distance between crank centre and piston centre
http://www.mech.uq.edu.au/courses/engg1010/dynamics_pracs/prac1/sketch.jpg
Therefore, using the Pythagoras theorem,
$$cos \phi=\sqrt{1-(\frac{r}{l})^2 sin^2 \theta}$$
Expanding the above expression using 'say'... the binomial theorem(its my choice and that's the problem) :
$$cos \phi=1-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{r}{l})^2sin^2\theta-\frac{1}{8}(\frac{r}{l})^4sin^4\theta$$

This is the part that makes it look like the "various harmonic components originate from the choice of approximation by the mathematician i.e binomial theorem" .

And hence,also the different orders of forces originate in the ICE. 1st order forces fluctuate at the speed of the crank and 2nd order forces fluctuate at 2 times crank rpm.

So,what is to say a mathematician used some other method of approximation of the cos(phi) expression on top and we arrived at a different magnitude of the accelerations,this would spoil our whole engine balance act,wouldn't it?
Was my question clear enough?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
All models are wrong, some are useful.
 
It is a bit hard to visualize inertial forces(unbalanced because the gas force exists irregularly- only once in 4 cycles for a 4 stroke) morphing into this whole bunch of primary,secondary,tertiary components.
 
How are you using the binomial theorem to expand that into your result? Can you post your math?
 
http://www.mech.uq.edu.au/courses/engg1010/dynamics_pracs/prac1/sketch.jpg

First,I can expand the expression derived from the pythagoras theorem([itex]cos\phi=(1-(\frac{r}{l}sin\theta)^2)^\frac{1}{2}[/itex]) using the binomial theorem as follows:
$$cos\phi=1-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{r}{l}sin\theta)^2+(\frac{\frac{1}{2}*(\frac{1}{2}-1)}{2!})(\frac{r}{l}sin\theta)^4-...+((\frac{r}{l}sin\theta)^2)^\frac{1}{2}$$

The powers of sin(theta) can be further expanded using the multiples of angles, like so:
$$sin^2\theta=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}cos2\theta$$
$$sin^4\theta=\frac{3}{8}-\frac{1}{2}cos2\theta+\frac{1}{8}cos4\theta$$

How I expand the above expressions can be explained by using the DeMoivre's theorem.For instance:
$$\begin{align}\sin^4 \theta &= (\sin^2\theta)^2\\ &= \left(\frac12-\frac12\cos(2\theta)\right)^2\\ &= \frac14 \left(1 - \cos(2\theta)\right)^2\\ &= \frac14\left(1 - 2 \cos(2\theta) + \cos^2(2 \theta)\right)\\ &= \frac14\left(1 - 2 \cos(2 \theta) + \frac12(\cos (4\theta) + 1)\right)\\ &= \frac14\left(\frac32 - 2\cos(2\theta) + \frac12\cos(4 \theta)\right)\\ &= \frac38 - \frac12\cos(2\theta) + \frac18\cos(4\theta).\end{align}$$

So,now you can see the math clearly and as as result of the above expansions,one substitutes [itex]cos\phi[/itex] in the expression for piston stroke(displacement) [itex]s=r(cos\theta +\frac{l}{r}cos\phi)[/itex]from which one can arrive at the expression for acceleration and hence=>intertial forces in a IC engine, which are now split into primary,secondary and more components BECAUSE of the choice of expansion we chose i.e the binomial theorem[itex]F=mr\omega^2(cos\theta+\frac{r}{l}cos2\theta+...)[/itex].
Note:the coefficient of theta is referred to as 'order of the harmonic'.

As you might know,engineers choose to balance these forces(+the unbalance due to gas forces also) based on the magnitudes derived from the expressions above. Please tell me what will happen if I choose to expand in another way.

It looks like mechanical engineers are assuming that the inertial forces in an engine will have different components(how and why these components arise in reality when there are only 4 links in a slider-crank mechanism still intrigues me),all based on the choice of mathematical function expansions-the binomial theorem.
Was my question clear?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K