I Why is Joule-Thomson effect isenthelpic?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ussername
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Enthalpy
AI Thread Summary
An experimental apparatus for realizing the Joule-Thomson effect is proposed, consisting of a thermally isolated pipe with a porous board separating two compartments, allowing for pressure variations. An energy balance equation is applied, confirming a steady state where mass flow rates in and out are equal, leading to the relationship between inlet and outlet velocities and densities. The continuity equation suggests that the ratio of velocities corresponds to the ratio of densities. However, the Joule-Thomson effect is isenthalpic only when kinetic and potential energy changes are negligible. Therefore, variations in velocities and densities can occur, impacting the measurements.
ussername
Messages
60
Reaction score
2
Let's have an experimental apparatus for realization of Joule-Thomson effect. It could be a thermally isolated pipe with a porous board separating two compartments inside. Different pressures can be set in the second compartment. The gas flows through the pipe and we measure temperature and pressure on the outlet.

Now applying a simple energy balance onto that pipe we get:
$$0=\dot{m}_{in}(h_{in}+\frac{v_{in}^{2}}{2}+g\cdot z_{in})-\dot{m}_{out}(h_{out}+\frac{v_{out}^{2}}{2}+g\cdot z_{out})$$
There is definitely a steady state (##\dot{m}_{in}=\dot{m}_{out}##) and there is no change of potential energy (##z_{in}=z_{out}##) so we get:
$$\Delta h=\frac{v_{in}^{2}-v_{out}^{2}}{2}$$
From the continuity equation we get:
$$\frac{v_{out}}{v_{in}}=\frac{\rho _{in}}{\rho _{out}}$$
Does it mean I will measure the same velocities ##v _{in}## and ##v _{out}## and the same densities ##\rho _{in}## and ##\rho _{out}## all the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ussername said:
Let's have an experimental apparatus for realization of Joule-Thomson effect. It could be a thermally isolated pipe with a porous board separating two compartments inside. Different pressures can be set in the second compartment. The gas flows through the pipe and we measure temperature and pressure on the outlet.

Now applying a simple energy balance onto that pipe we get:
$$0=\dot{m}_{in}(h_{in}+\frac{v_{in}^{2}}{2}+g\cdot z_{in})-\dot{m}_{out}(h_{out}+\frac{v_{out}^{2}}{2}+g\cdot z_{out})$$
There is definitely a steady state (##\dot{m}_{in}=\dot{m}_{out}##) and there is no change of potential energy (##z_{in}=z_{out}##) so we get:
$$\Delta h=\frac{v_{in}^{2}-v_{out}^{2}}{2}$$
From the continuity equation we get:
$$\frac{v_{out}}{v_{in}}=\frac{\rho _{in}}{\rho _{out}}$$
Does it mean I will measure the same velocities ##v _{in}## and ##v _{out}## and the same densities ##\rho _{in}## and ##\rho _{out}## all the time?
The Joule Thomson effect is isenthalpic only if kinetic energy and potential energy effects are negligible. Otherwise, no.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top