Why is log(x^n) = n log(x)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the identity log(x^n) = n log(x) and seeks an explanation rooted in exponent rules rather than logarithmic properties. Participants explore the relationship between logarithms and exponents, emphasizing that logarithmic identities can be derived from exponential definitions. The conversation highlights that understanding the definition of logarithms is crucial for grasping why the identity holds true. Various methods to prove the identity are mentioned, suggesting that the approach may vary based on how "log(x)" is defined. Ultimately, a clear understanding of both logarithmic and exponential rules is necessary to fully comprehend the identity.
nobb
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey
I am doing an investigation for logarithms, and I have a question. logx^n = nlogx. Based on previous knowledge of exponents, could someone please explain why this is true? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let lgx = m. Then, 10m = x.

xr = (10m)r
xr = 10rm
lgxr = rm
lgxr = rlgx
 
I don't really get what you are doing. You are solving it with knowledge of logs. Is it possible to answer the question with knowledge from exponents only? Or could you please tell me how this relates to exponents?
 
Use the identity:
a^x=y \iff x=\log_ay
Then with the familiar rules for manipulating exponentials, the rules for logarithms follow automatically.
 
OK, I try again.

Let lgx = m. Then,

10m = x. <--- This is taken directly from the definition of logs.

x = 10m

xr = (10m)r <-- follows from the rule that says if a = b, then ar = b r

xr = 10rm <-- follows from the rule that says (ar)m = arm

lgxr = rm <--- from the definition of logs again.

lgxr = rlgx <--- Remember the definition we gave on the first line of this post that states that m = lgx?
 
There are a number of DIFFERENT ways to prove log(xn)= n log(x)
depending on exactly how you are DEFINING "log(x)". What is your definition of
log(x)??
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top