Why is methodological behaviorism limited in its scientific approach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkir
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limitations of methodological behaviorism in explaining human behavior, particularly in response to stimuli, such as the knee-jerk reflex. It questions whether such reflexes are driven by beliefs or desires, highlighting a fundamental issue with behaviorism's reliance on observable phenomena. The conversation argues that behaviorism's strict adherence to observable data restricts scientific progress, suggesting that successful scientific fields, like physics, thrive on the development of models that predict outcomes, even when they include unobservable elements. The critique emphasizes that empirical science should focus on constructing models with testable consequences rather than merely collecting data, which can lead to uninteresting results.
mkir
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm stuck on this problem and I was wondering if you guys can give me any insights about it using methodological behaviorism to explain it.

Your knee will jerk if something were to hit it. Is this because of your belief/desires? If it isn't, would going out with your friends to watch a film be any different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The major problem with behaviourism is the fallacious belief that it cannot be scientific to construct models that include elements one cannot directly observe.

Physics would have stagnated at Renaissance level if it were not for its willingness to construct such models.


The point of empirical science is NOT that we are merely to collect data and set them in some sort of "system".

Rather, we are to CONSTRUCT models that have predictable and detectable CONSEQUENCES, and then go into the lab trying to see whether those consequences occur or not.

By limiting itself to collecting and systematizing data, behaviourism has reduced itself to produce uninteresting curve-fitting results.
 
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Back
Top