Why is my book using different equations to solve for velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter outxbreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of different equations to solve for velocity in the context of energy conservation, specifically kinetic and potential energy. Participants are examining the apparent discrepancies in their textbook's approach to these equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, questioning when to use the equations ΔK = −ΔU versus ΔK = ΔU. There is a focus on understanding the underlying principles rather than just the mathematical forms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the equations' meanings and their applications, noting that both equations reflect the same physical principles. However, there remains uncertainty about the appropriate contexts for each equation, and the discussion is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion arising from the textbook's presentation, with participants highlighting the importance of understanding the signs associated with energy changes in different scenarios.

outxbreak
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I am having a difficult time trying to figure out why my book says that I should solve for v by:
(1) Set the kinetic energy equal to the change in potential energy and solve for v

Then 3 problems later it says solve for v by:
(2)Set ΔK = −ΔU and solve for v

http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/1995/1idz.jpg


I just need to know why they are using different equations to solve for v.. this is not making any sense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
outxbreak said:
I am having a difficult time trying to figure out why my book says that I should solve for v by:
(1) Set the kinetic energy equal to the change in potential energy and solve for v

Then 3 problems later it says solve for v by:
(2)Set ΔK = −ΔU and solve for v


I just need to know why they are using different equations to solve for v.. this is not making any sense.

They are essentially the same equations. ΔK = −ΔU means that the gain in kinetic energy is equal in magnitude to the decrease in potential energy.

The V (upper case) in problem 21 is the potential difference. The v (lower case) is the velocity of the charged particle.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
They are essentially the same equations. ΔK = −ΔU means that the gain in kinetic energy is equal in magnitude to the decrease in potential energy.


But how do I know when to use
ΔK = −ΔU
or
ΔK = ΔU

That is my problem. :'(
 
The book's being sloppy in the first case. It's really using ##\Delta K = \lvert \Delta U \rvert##. For both the electron and proton, the potential energy decreases, so ##\Delta U < 0##.

The proton rolls down electric potential hills, so Vfinal is less than Vinitial. ΔV is therefore negative, and ΔU = e ΔV is also negative. The electron rolls up electric potential hills, so Vfinal is greater than Vinitial. ΔV is therefore positive. The electron has a negative charges, so ΔU = -e ΔV again is negative. Because ΔU is negative, if you try to use ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \Delta U##, there'd be no real solution for v. You need to use ##\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = -\Delta U##. In other words, you always use ##\Delta K = -\Delta U##.

In electromagnetics, it's pretty easy to make sign mistakes if you try to rely solely on the math. It's often easier simply to neglect the signs and calculate the magnitude of quantities and then insert the correct sign based on physical intuition. For instance, in both cases here, we know that the particles are going to speed up, so their kinetic energy increases. This increase comes at the expense of a decrease in potential energy. To find the speed, we don't really care about the sign of ΔU; we just need its magnitude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K