Why Is My Calculated Molar Mass of Phthalic Acid Different from My Peers'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A_lilah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Organic
AI Thread Summary
The calculated molar mass of phthalic acid was approximately 135g, which is about 30g lower than the values obtained by peers. The experiment involved titration with NaOH, and the calculations were verified as correct by the professor. Possible reasons for the discrepancy include using a different titrant volume or a contaminated sample, although the professor confirmed all samples were from the same source. The participant conducted the titration four times, consistently obtaining similar results. Clarifying titrant usage and volumes may help resolve the issue.
A_lilah
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We did an experiment in lab today where we were given a compound and we had to figure out the chemical formula and molar mass using titration (titrated with NaOH). The compound I got was phthalic acid, and the average molar mass I got was ~135g. This is about 30 grams off of what everyone else in my group got.

Homework Equations



[(M NaOH)(L NaOH)]/2 = moles of phthalic acid (there were two equivalency points, which is why it had to be divided by 2)

moles phthalic acid / mass of sample used = grams of phthalic acid

We were then given the mass percents of each element, and I divided these by the atomic masses of each element, then used the ratio of them to figure out the chemical formula, and whether it was a multiple of the ratios used or not (it was: actual formula = C6H4O2)

My professor said all of my calculations were correct.

The Attempt at a Solution



So my ultimate question is: Why is my molecular mass 30 grams short of everyone else who used phthalic acid? I did the titration 4 times (the 4th time with the TA watching~ an interesting experience), and all 4 times I got between 130 and 137.

Any ideas would be great. Thanks! :)

(ps~ this may be the wrong place to post this, but I wasn't sure...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If even your professor has verified all your calculations, then perhaps you can blame a contaminated chemical sample @.@
 
I thought of that too, but the prof said that the samples were all from the same source... good thinking though
 
Show details of your work.

Have you used the same titrant others did?
 
Which volume of NaOH titratant did you use? The one for the first eq. point or the second?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top