Why Is My Calculation of Rotational Inertia Incorrect?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of three balls with different masses attached to a massless rod. The initial calculations yield a total rotational inertia of 3ML²/2, while the provided answer is 3ML²/4, leading to confusion. Participants agree on using the moment of inertia formula I = Σ(mir²) but suspect an arithmetic error or a flaw in the answer key. There's speculation about whether the distribution of mass in a sphere for the largest mass might affect the calculation, but the lack of a specified radius suggests it should not. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic and clarity in problem statements.
sskk221
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Three identical balls, with masses of M, 2M, and 3M, are fastened to a massless rod of length
L as shown. The rotational inertia about the left end of the rod is:

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/1424/1234sjy.jpg

Homework Equations



I = MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I total = (3M)(0)^2 + (2M)(L/2)^2 + (M)(L)^2

I total = 3ML^2/2

It says the answer is 3ML^2/4 though. Thanks for the help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes MD SHAHARIAZ ALAM
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm...

<br /> I = mr^{2}<br />

<br /> I = (3M)0^{2} + 2M(\frac{L}{2})^{2}) + ML^{2}<br />

Therefore;

<br /> I = \frac{1}{2}ML^{2} + ML^{2}<br />

<br /> I = \frac{3}{2} ML^{2}<br />

I get the same as you.

The definition of the moment of inertia is;

SUM( miri2 ) So I'm preaty certian that we are following the correct method. So perhaps it is some arithmetical mistake we are both making.

2/4 is 1/2 yes and 1/2mr2 + mr2 is mr2(1/2 + 1)
(1/2 + 1) = 3/2. Nope. I think your answer book might be flawed.

UNLESS you are meant to use the distribution of mass in a sphere for the first mass (3M). Mindyou, because they havn't given you a radius for the sphere I would assume not.

Haths
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top