Why is my integration in Mathematica not working?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aminbkh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
aminbkh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question about fitting in Mathematica.I have a function like this:
F=T*Y^(0.5) T is temperature but Y obtained from this coupled equation 1-u*Y=u(1-u/Y^.4)^.5*Y
I have T and F from experimental data.so I want to obtain u from fitting.
could you please advise me how can I do it by Mathematica.
Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Question about matlab

Hi,
I have question if you could answer me, I really appreciate it. I have an equation which I wan to solve it to experimental data \[Rho] = t*Y^.5*a + Y^.8/sqrt (1 + 4*Y)*t*a^2 where a is parameter which I want to obtain by fitting and t is vector that I know for each experiment. and Y obey this equation 1 - (1 - u)*Y = u*(1 + g/t*y^.5)^.5*Y^.43 where u and g are again system Dependant parameter which should be obtained by fitting it means that in each iteration first that coupled equation should be solved with respect to Y and put in rho equation to obtain u,g and a do you know if MATLAB is able to do that or not?or ant other suggestion I really appreciate your help
 


thank you for your answer
but the problem is the function Y should be solved and then put in second equation and both of them have some adujstable parameters,
could you advise me more please.
 


Hi all,
I have this integration in mathematica but I don't know why doest work.
Could you please help me?

Integrate[HeavisideTheta[0.1 - x], {x, 0, 100}]

Thank you so much for your help
 


aminbkh said:
Hi all,
I have this integration in mathematica but I don't know why doest work.
Could you please help me?

Integrate[HeavisideTheta[0.1 - x], {x, 0, 100}]

Thank you so much for your help

It works when I do it. See the attached notebook. Did you mis-type it?

Edit: Oops, I see what you mean. The answer should be 0.1, not 100.0. Looks like a bug. It plots the Heviside function correctly, but appears not to integrate it correctly. Hmmm.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top