Why is my TI-84 giving different results for complex number calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The user is experiencing discrepancies in complex number calculations on a TI-84 when converting between polar and rectangular coordinates. They calculated 6<30 by hand and obtained 5.196 + 3i, but the calculator returned 0.926 + 5.93i. The issue was identified as a setting problem, with the calculator needing to be in the correct mode for accurate results. The user confirmed that entering the angle in radians yielded the correct conversion. Ultimately, the confusion stemmed from the calculator's mode settings affecting the calculations.
1st1
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having some difficulty understanding what is going on with the TI-84 complex number calculation in switching between rectangular and polar coordinates, hopefully someone can clarify this for me. For example, take the term 6<30 (6 angle 30). When I calculate this by hand going from polar to rectangular I get 5.196 + 3i. However, if I try to switch 6<30 into rectangular coordinates with my TI-84 I get 0.926 + 5.93i. Can anyone explain to me what is happening?

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have the calculator set to radians instead of degrees.
 
The calculator is set to degrees, not radians. I've checked.
However if I put the angle in as radians it does work.
Maybe it only works with radians even though I'm in degree mode.
 
Last edited:
rtfm
 
Ok, I figured it out thanks for the input.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top