Why is My Voltage Lower than Standard Cell Potential?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the setup of a Galvanic cell using copper and zinc electrodes in their respective sulfate solutions, with a KCl-soaked filter paper serving as the salt bridge. The user reports obtaining a voltage of about 0.8 volts, which is significantly lower than the expected standard cell potential of 1.1 volts. Initial thoughts suggest that the salt bridge may not be sufficiently conductive, prompting the addition of more filter paper, which did increase the voltage. Further experimentation involved diluting the zinc solution, resulting in an increased voltage. This led to inquiries about the effects of ion concentration on cell potential, referencing the Nernst equation, which explains how changes in ion concentration can influence voltage readings. The discussion emphasizes that while achieving standard cell potential is possible, it can be affected by the concentrations of the reactants and the conductivity of the salt bridge. Suggestions include verifying the molarity of the solutions and ensuring proper preparation to minimize errors in voltage measurements.
Calle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have set up a Galvanic cell and used filter paper that is soaked in KCl as salt bridge. The electrolyte I used is 1M and the experiment is carried out in room temperature. However, I am unable to obtain the standard cell potential. The voltage values I obtained was lower.

I was thinking maybe the salt bridge is not good enough, so I added more filter paper strips. The voltage did increase, but I thought the salt bridge should not affect the results?

Is it impossible to obtain the standard cell potential? Could it be the resistance of the voltmeter? Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How far off are you? What two metals are you using?
 
try this http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/halfcell.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks!

I am using copper and zinc in copper (II) sulphate and zinc sulphate solutions. The voltage i obtained is about 0.3 volt away from the standard 1.1 volt after i added more layers of filter papers.

I tried to decrease the zinc ions in the solution by diluting the solution and the voltage increased. Why is that so?
 
Calle said:
I am using copper and zinc in copper (II) sulphate and zinc sulphate solutions. The voltage i obtained is about 0.3 volt away from the standard 1.1 volt after i added more layers of filter papers.

It could be that the salt bridge is not very conductive for some reason. Adding additional papers lowers the resistance of the circut.

Calle said:
I tried to decrease the zinc ions in the solution by diluting the solution and the voltage increased. Why is that so?

In this redox couple which metal is being oxidized (solubilized) and which is reduced? For the metal that is oxidized, the soluble ion of that metal represents the product of the reaction. How might removing (through dilution) the product of the oxidation (soluble metal ion) affect the reaction? Review the Nernst equation.
 
>>> Is it impossible to obtain the standard cell potential?

No, but if I can remember correctly this should only occur briefly. When both Copper and Zinc are both 1M in solution it should be at standard potential...as soon as the current starts running the concentration of one ion in solution increases while the other decreases...the moment that happens the observed voltage starts to change away from the standard potential (when you changed the zinc concentration in solution a similar effect occured). As chemistree said the Nernst equation describes this.

If you are far off from expectations, it might be wise to check the copper and zinc solutions you are using for the inital voltage check (check the molarity of each with titration and very carefully prepare each at 1M for the initial voltage reading...probably this would be the source of error).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top