Why is NaCl in the gas state covalent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raziel2701
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas State
AI Thread Summary
The bond in gaseous NaCl is primarily considered polar covalent due to energy dynamics during dissociation, where the formation of neutral Na• and Cl• is favored over Na+ and Cl–. This occurs because the ionization potential of sodium exceeds the electron affinity of chlorine, making the energy cost for ionization higher than the energy gain from electron capture. In the gas phase, the long-range Coulomb interaction leads to the formation of neutral species, reinforcing the covalent character of the bond. While ionic bonding is preferred at shorter distances in a lattice, the absence of this structure in gas phase NaCl alters the bonding nature. Overall, the energetic considerations dictate the classification of the bond in gaseous NaCl.
Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
I'm supposing that it has something to do with the fact that it is no longer in a lattice, so it's just one Na and one Cl ion bonding together but why would it be a mostly covalent bond in this case?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It is all a matter of energy. The bond may be regarded as very polar covalent or ionic, for whatever purpose you might want. Nature does not know about chemical bonds!

However, if you try to dissociate gaseous NaCl, the lowest energy pathway is to
Na + Cl
rather than
Na+ + Cl
Because the energy cost of removing the electron from sodium (ionization potential) is larger than the energy return from the chlorine atom picking up the extra electron (electron affinity).

That is the real reason why for most, but not all, purposes, the bond in gaseous NaCl should be regarded as polar covalent.
 
Due to the long range of the Coulomb interaction, bond dissociation in vacuo always leads to neutral species.
What is maybe interesting is to look at the potential energy surfaces of NaCl in the gas phase.
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSJPBDQhxnHyh-6ffcruCX2uZvPMS75MLhgm9oxVPlnh5-WQZ3_

This shows that at bonding distances, ionic bonding is preferred.
This is nicely discussed in Paulings book "The nature of the chemical bond"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raziel2701 said:
I'm supposing that it has something to do with the fact that it is no longer in a lattice, so it's just one Na and one Cl ion bonding together but why would it be a mostly covalent bond in this case?
The ion form is energetically stabilized in the lattice because every single ion is surrounded by several ions of opposite charge (not one ion only).
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top