A Why is ##\omega_c \tau >>1## for several revolutions?

Abigale
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I read about charge carriers in semiconductors in a magnetic field.
They write that for several revolutions ##\omega_c \tau >>1## holds.
But I think for one revolution it is ##\omega_c \tau = 2 \pi##.
(##\tau## is the scattering time)
Why they do not write ##\omega_c \tau >> 2 \pi## in the solid state physics books?

Thank you
Abbi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think for a moment what ##a>>b## means as opposed to ##a>b##. This is an "order of magnitude" comparison. If 1,000 is much greater than 1 so is 6,318.53071 ...
 
Okay thank you,
makes sense.
But I would write larger than ##>>2 \pi## to denote to get more than one revolution.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top