Why is p=fv different than calculatingit manually

  • Thread starter Thread starter jiggleswiggly
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between calculating power output using the formula P = Fv and the distance-time method. A sprinter's force was determined to be 87.5N, and while using the distance formula d = 1/2 * a * t^2 led to an incorrect power output, applying P = Fv yielded the correct result. The confusion arises because the average power calculated from distance and time does not account for the sprinter's increasing speed, leading to a lower value. In contrast, P = Fv provides instantaneous power, which is why the results differ. Understanding that power output is not constant during acceleration clarifies the reason for the inconsistency.
jiggleswiggly
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A 49.0 sprinter, starting from rest, runs 45.0in 7.10 at constant acceleration.
What is the magnitude of the horizontal force acting on the sprinter?


okay so I got 87.5N which is correct

Then it asks:
What is the sprinter's power output at 1.70 , 3.60 , and 5.50 ?


why is it when you use d=1/2*a*t^2
it is wrong

see:
(1/2)*(1.78)(1.7)^2 = 2.57 for distance

then 2.57*87.5= 224 joules

then for power it is 224/1.7 = 131

but the answer is exactly twice that

if you use p=f*v you get the correct answer straight away

shouldn't these be the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the power output isn't constant, and when you're calculating the power using the distance traveled and the time elapsed, you're finding the average power up to that point, not the instantaneous power.
 
Back
Top