Why is Perpendicularity in 2D and 3D Important?

bezgin
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Let
n = (a,b,c)
v = (x,y,z)

Whatever the dot product of these vectors equal to, let's call d, the vector n is perpendicular to v. Again, I cannot stay calm and ask WHY?

If we call n = (a,b); v= (x,y) ==> ax+by= d and the slope of this line is -a/b whereas the slope of the vector n is b/a. Yes, they are perpendicular since -a/b * b/a = -1 (tanx * tan(90+x) = -1)
I can visualize and experiment it in 2-D but in 3-D I can't.

Also, how do we define a line that passes through the origin and, for instance (1,1,1). I have trouble transforming my logic from x-y plane to space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever the dot product of these vectors equal to, let's call d, the vector n is perpendicular to v. Again, I cannot stay calm and ask WHY?

Where did you get this faulty statement from? n and v are perpendicular if and only if their dot product is 0 (i.e. d = 0).
 
The line that passes throught (0,0,0) and (1,1,1) is given by:
x= t, y= t, z= t.

You know that the equations will be linear and taking t= 0 gives (0,0,0) while taking t= 1 gives (1,1,1).

In general: any straight line, in 3 dimensions, can be written x= at+ b, y= ct+ d, z= et+ f for some choice of a, b, c, d, e, f. If you are given two points, (x00,z0) and (x1,y1,z1), choose either one to be t= 0, the other t= 1 and plug the values into the equations. That gives 6 equations for the 6 letters.

If you understand that one, try this: what's the equation of the line passing through (0,0,0,0) and (1, 1, 1, 1) in 4 dimensions?
 
Muzza said:
Where did you get this faulty statement from? n and v are perpendicular if and only if their dot product is 0 (i.e. d = 0).

What I meant was, the vector (a,b,c) is always perpendicular to the plane ax+by+cz = d for any value of d. WHY?
 
What defines a plane? It is a point in the plane, p and the normal, n. Why? A point, x, is in the plane if and only if the displacement vector from p to x is zero, ie

n.(p-x)=0, or n.x=n.p

we set n.p = d.
 
bezgin said:
Let
n = (a,b,c)
v = (x,y,z)

Whatever the dot product of these vectors equal to, let's call d, the vector n is perpendicular to v. Again, I cannot stay calm and ask WHY?
no.

First the dot product gives a scaler, not a vector
second, the two vectors are only perpendicular if their dot is 0


let u = n
let k = v - (<v,u>/||u||^2)*u

Where <> is the dot product, and ||u|| is u’s norm

u and k are perpendicular
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top