Why is pure sulfuric acid unsuitable for direct standard solution preparation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jadelamlam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid
AI Thread Summary
Pure sulfuric acid is unsuitable for direct standard solution preparation because it is hygroscopic, meaning it readily absorbs moisture from the air. This absorption can alter the concentration of the acid, leading to inaccurate titration results. The presence of water can dilute the acid, affecting the stoichiometry of the reaction during titration. Additionally, the variability in concentration makes it difficult to achieve precise measurements. Therefore, using pure sulfuric acid directly compromises the reliability of the standard solution.
jadelamlam
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
titration-->pure sulphuric acid

Homework Statement


Why pure/conc. sulphuric acid is not suitable to prepare a standard solution directly?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that it is hygroscopic,but what does it mean?Why absorbing moisture from the air will affect the result of titration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top