Why is spin number half integer, especially +1/2,-1/2 for electrons?

Nick Jackson
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Ok guys, I know this must be pretty basic for but I am new to this section of physics. Anyway, my question is a two-part one, I guess:
1) Why does the spin number get only half integer values in fermions and integer values in bosons, mesons, etc.?
2) How do we conclude that the spin number is taking the values +1/2 and -1/2 in electrons (I mean mathematically)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The spin-statistics theorem of relativistic quantum field theory states that particles with integer spin must be bosons, and that particles with half-odd-integer spin must be fermions.

2) For a particle with position operator ##\vec x## and momentum operator ##\vec p##, we can define an orbital angular momentum operator ##\vec L = \vec x \times \vec p##. From the canonical commutation relation ##[x_i,p_j]=i\hbar\delta_{ij}##, we can derive the commutation relation ##[L_i,L_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}L_k##. We then postulate that, in addition to orbital angular momentum, a particle may have spin angular momentum. This involves an additional operator ##\vec S## with commutation relations ##[S_i,S_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}S_k##. It is then possible to prove mathematically that the eigenvalues of ##{\vec S}{}^2## are ##s(s+1)\hbar^2## where the allowed values of ##s## are ##0,1/2,1,3/2,2,\ldots##. It is then an empirical fact that ##s=1/2## for electrons.

In relativistic quantum field theory, each type of particle arises as an excitation of a particular field. How the fields transform under the Lorentz group determines the spin of the corresponding particle.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top