Why is spin number half integer, especially +1/2,-1/2 for electrons?

Nick Jackson
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Ok guys, I know this must be pretty basic for but I am new to this section of physics. Anyway, my question is a two-part one, I guess:
1) Why does the spin number get only half integer values in fermions and integer values in bosons, mesons, etc.?
2) How do we conclude that the spin number is taking the values +1/2 and -1/2 in electrons (I mean mathematically)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The spin-statistics theorem of relativistic quantum field theory states that particles with integer spin must be bosons, and that particles with half-odd-integer spin must be fermions.

2) For a particle with position operator ##\vec x## and momentum operator ##\vec p##, we can define an orbital angular momentum operator ##\vec L = \vec x \times \vec p##. From the canonical commutation relation ##[x_i,p_j]=i\hbar\delta_{ij}##, we can derive the commutation relation ##[L_i,L_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}L_k##. We then postulate that, in addition to orbital angular momentum, a particle may have spin angular momentum. This involves an additional operator ##\vec S## with commutation relations ##[S_i,S_j]=i\hbar\varepsilon_{ijk}S_k##. It is then possible to prove mathematically that the eigenvalues of ##{\vec S}{}^2## are ##s(s+1)\hbar^2## where the allowed values of ##s## are ##0,1/2,1,3/2,2,\ldots##. It is then an empirical fact that ##s=1/2## for electrons.

In relativistic quantum field theory, each type of particle arises as an excitation of a particular field. How the fields transform under the Lorentz group determines the spin of the corresponding particle.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top