Why Is Sqrt(3) Used in Calculating VRMS for Triangle Waves?

AI Thread Summary
The VRMS for AC triangle waves is calculated using the formula VRMS = Vmax / sqrt(3), contrasting with sine waves which use VRMS = Vmax / sqrt(2). The use of sqrt(3) arises from the relationship between the peak and RMS values, known as the crest factor, which is different for triangle and sine waves. To derive this, one must integrate the square of the triangle wave over one period and take the square root of the average, reflecting the wave's linear characteristics. The squared triangle wave consistently has a lower time average than the squared sine wave, justifying the smaller RMS multiplier. Understanding these calculations clarifies why sqrt(3) is appropriate for triangle waves.
StonieJ
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I feel like I'm so close to the correct answer for this problem, but I just can't seem to bring it all together.

Code:
To find the V[sub]RMS[/sub] of an AC sine wave, you use the following 
forumla, where V[sub]max[/sub] is the maximum amplitude:

V[sub]RMS[/sub] = V[sub]max[/sub] / sqrt(2)


To find the V[sub]RMS[/sub] of an AC triangle wave, you use:

V[sub]RMS[/sub] = V[sub]max[/sub] / sqrt(3)


In one sentence, give a good qualitative reason why sqrt(3) is appropriate 
for the triangle wave.

I have a bunch of vague and un-elegant ideas, but not really one good sentence. I've been Googling on the subject and coming up with crest factor (peak / RMS), which is sqrt(3) for triangle waves and sqrt(2) for sine waves. But I have yet to bring it all together. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to integrate the square of the wave form over one period and divide by the integration interval to find the mean square. Then you take the square root.
 
because in the triangle wave, V is proportional to t... and V^2 is proportional to t^2, when you do the RMS, you need to take the squreroot of \int V^2 dt, this is where the root 3 come from
 
Hint:

The method for calculating the "crest factor" is simple:

1) Square the function under consideration. (That's the "square" part of the term "root mean squared.")

2) Average that squared function over time; one period is enough. (That's the "mean" part.)

3) Take the square root of the result. (That's obviously the "root" part.)

For the sine wave, the RMS multiplier is thus:

\sqrt{\frac{\int_0^{2 \pi} \sin^2 x dx}{2 \pi}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

To come up with an elegant sentence, first, recognize that 1/\sqrt{3} is smaller than 1/\sqrt{2}. Next, graph the squared triangle wave superimposed over the squared sine wave. Notice that the squared sine wave is always equal to or greater than the squared triangle wave. Thus, its time average is correspondingly larger.

- Warren
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top