Why Is the Balmer Series More Commonly Seen than Other Hydrogen Emission Series?

AI Thread Summary
The Balmer series is more commonly observed in hydrogen emission spectra because it corresponds to electron transitions falling to the n=2 energy level, which emits visible light. In contrast, the Lyman series emits ultraviolet light and the Paschen series emits infrared light, making them less visible to the naked eye. The visibility of these series is also influenced by the equipment used; high-quality spectrometers are needed to distinguish between hydrogen and deuterium spectra. The discussion highlights the importance of spectroscopic tools in observing different emission series. Overall, the Balmer series is prevalent due to its visibility in the spectrum compared to other series.
Jules18
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
I keep seeing the hydrogen emission spectrum from the Balman series (when an electron falls to n=2). It's all over my textbook.
Why don't I ever see the Lyman series or any other series?

Is it really rare for hydrogen electrons to fall to energy levels other than n=2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Only the Balmer series is visible. The Lyman series is UV, and the Paschen series is IR. If you have a good spectrometer, compare hydrogen to the deuterium spectrum.
 
Thanks.
 
It takes a very good spectrometer to distinguish hydrogen from deuterium. A decent Eschelle will do it, but the sort of thing you will find in a Chem 101 lab probably won't.
 
I love the names...Lyman, Balmer,Paschen, Bracket,Pfund and Humphreys.We need one more to make the magnificent seven.How about Dilbert?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top