Why is the baseline of my spectra raised?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magnesium12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unexpected increase in the baseline of spectra when a black cloth is used to cover a cuvette and spectrometer. It raises questions about the effects of stray light on measurements, particularly in a double beam spectrophotometer setup. The observations suggest that covering the instrument may have inadvertently allowed more stray light to affect the reference sample. A recommendation is made to switch the cuvettes to determine if the issue lies with the cuvettes or the instrument itself. The conversation emphasizes the importance of ensuring proper setup and calibration for accurate spectral measurements.
magnesium12
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I took 2 spectra (measuring intensity) of a blank cuvette with a spectrometer. The first time (a) I did not put a black cloth on top of cuvette/spectrometer. The second time (b) I did put a black cloth on the system. The baseline of (b) was notably higher than the baseline of (a). Shouldn't it be the other way around since having a black cloth stops stray light from entering the system, which should decrease intensity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to check the spectrophotometer assuming the cuvettes are equal, or the other way round? I presume probably the first.

Is this a double beam spectrophotometer? That works by comparing intensity of light passing through the sample to be measured with another through a reference cuvette. So yes, the effect of covering the instrument seems to indicate stray light. But if, say, they were in balance when uncovered and you seem to have absorption by the sample, you could explain the observations by the stray light entering the pathway of the reference sample more than me one you think you're measuring. Maybe the person who last adjusted the instrument did so without covering it! Anyway a thing surely to do, since you must worry about the cuvettes in themselves, or how they sit exactly in the instrument, is to switch them. If you then have a negative baseline, it's the fault of the cuvettes. If you still have the same positive baseline, it's the fault of the instrument, the electronics of the optics.

If you are able to do anything more come back and tell us any results
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
598
Replies
9
Views
283
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Back
Top