Why Is the Calculated Power for the Lightbulbs Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter floridianfisher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total power delivered to three 70 W, 120 V lightbulbs connected to a 120 V power source. The user initially calculates the equivalent resistance incorrectly, leading to an erroneous power calculation of 31.1 watts. Correct calculations require determining the resistance of each bulb using R = V^2/P, and then finding the equivalent resistance for the parallel configuration of the bulbs. The potential differences across the bulbs were found to be 80 V and 40.12 V, but the power calculation needs to be revisited with the correct equivalent resistance. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the correct power output in such electrical configurations.
floridianfisher
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three 70.0 W, 120 V lightbulbs are connected across a V = 120 V power
source, as shown in Figure P18.48. (Assume that the resistance of each bulb is constant even though, in reality, the resistance increases markedly with current.)

http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g2...er/physics.gif
Figure P18.48
(a) Find the total power delivered to the three bulbs.
wrong check mark
Your answer differs from the correct answer by 10% to 100%. W
(b) Find the potential difference across each light bulb.
VR1 = correct check mark V
VR2 = correct check mark V
VR3 = correct check mark

Homework Equations


p=v^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the potential differences they were 80 and 40.12, 40.12 respectively. However I cannot find the power

I have Req as being 462.9 so then i use power = 120^2/462.9 and i get 31.1 watts?!?
I have no idea why this isn't working please give me a clue
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Req is wrong. For a single bulb we get p = V^2/R, so R = V^2/70. Then compute Req. R_2 and R_3 are parellel, so replace them with their equivalent resitance etc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top