Why Is the Calculated Temperature of the Universe Different from 3K?

AI Thread Summary
The calculated temperature of the universe based on cosmic microwave background radiation is often found to be around 2.725 K, despite initial calculations suggesting a lower value of 1.5456 K. This discrepancy arises because the peak of the wavelength distribution does not align with the peak of the frequency distribution due to the non-linear nature of the blackbody spectrum. The relationship between peak wavelength and peak frequency is not straightforward, as the proportionality constants differ. Therefore, using the formula λpeak = c / νpeak is not valid in this context. Understanding the peaks of both distributions is essential for accurate temperature calculations.
mystreet123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two scientists detected the cosmic microwave background radiation at a frequency of 160 GHz. What is the temperature of the universe?

Homework Equations


peak wavelength x temperature = 2.898 x 10^-3
c = f x wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the wavelength of the microwave radiation to be 1.875x10^-3m. So the temperature is 1.5456K.
But the answer is 3K... How come??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mystreet123 said:
Two scientists detected the cosmic microwave background radiation at a frequency of 160 GHz. What is the temperature of the universe?

The cosmic microwave background radiation has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.72548±0.00057 K.
The spectral radiance dEν/dν peaks at 160.23 GHz.

see detail at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background
 
The peak of the wavelength distribution is not at the same place as the peak of the frequency distribution, because the blackbody spectrum is not linear. So you cannot say: λpeak = c / νpeak. Try reading this link. Or try taking the blackbody distribution I(λ) and differentiate to find the peak, then compare it to the peak of I(ν). You will then see why they are different.
 
phyzguy said:
The peak of the wavelength distribution is not at the same place as the peak of the frequency distribution, because the blackbody spectrum is not linear. So you cannot say: λpeak = c / νpeak. Try reading this link. Or try taking the blackbody distribution I(λ) and differentiate to find the peak, then compare it to the peak of I(ν). You will then see why they are different.
Thanks for replying!
From the link you gave me, "However the form of the law remains the same: the peak wavelength is inversely proportional to temperature (or the peak frequency is directly proportional to temperature)." Why couldn't I use the v=fλ to find peak frequency?
 
mystreet123 said:
Thanks for replying!
From the link you gave me, "However the form of the law remains the same: the peak wavelength is inversely proportional to temperature (or the peak frequency is directly proportional to temperature)." Why couldn't I use the v=fλ to find peak frequency?

It's true that, "the peak wavelength is inversely proportional to temperature (or the peak frequency is directly proportional to temperature)". But the proportionality constants are different and the peaks occur in different places, so the peak frequency is not related to the peak wavelength by λpeak = c / νpeak. The reason is that the differential dν is not linearly related to the differential dλ. I'm going to repeat what I said before. Try finding the peaks of the two distributions and you will see why λpeak = c / νpeak does not work.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
168
Back
Top