Why is the change in angle of precession equal to dL/L?

AI Thread Summary
A rapidly rotating gyroscope precesses around its perch when released horizontally, with angular momentum represented by L and a small change in momentum by dL. The relationship dA = dL/L is discussed, where dA is the change in the angle of L. The reasoning behind this is that as dL decreases, it approaches the arc length, which is directly related to the angle in radians. The use of radial coordinates clarifies that the radius is L, making the relationship valid. This explanation resolves the confusion about why dL/L corresponds to a change in angle rather than the sine of the angle.
trobinson41
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a rapidly rotating gyroscope attached to a perch is released in a horizontal position -- that is, so that the axis of the gyroscope is horizontal -- the gyroscope will precess around it's perch. Let L represent its angular momentum. Let dL represent a small change in that momentum. Let dA represent the corresponding change in the angle of L. According to all the references I've found, dA = dL/L. I don't understand this. Shouldn't dL/L be the change in the sine of the angle, not the angle? See attached diagram. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • precess.jpg
    precess.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 483
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like dL and dA are both measured in radial coordinates.
dL = L * dA will give you the appropriate measure to arrive at the point L(t + dt) in the illustration. If you were to use the sine, you would be headed to a point more than |L| away from the center.
 
Your mention of radial coordinates jogged my memory. The angle in radians is the arc length / radius. The radius in this case is L. Since the arc length approaches dL as the length of dL decreases, dL/L approaches dA. I think that's the reasoning that's being used. Thanks for your help.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top