Why is the Charge on the Equivalent Capacitor the Same as C1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Strawberry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Series
AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit of capacitors C1 and C2, the charge on the equivalent capacitor is equal to the charge on C1, as both capacitors share the same charge due to the series configuration. The relationship q = CV applies, but one must consider that the voltage across C1 is not the total voltage applied; it is only a portion of it. The correct approach involves using the formula q1 = C1 * V1, where V1 is the voltage across C1. Understanding this distinction clarifies why the charge on the equivalent capacitor matches that of C1. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing voltage distribution in series circuits when calculating charge.
Strawberry
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Q17. Capacitors C1 and C2 are connected in series and a potential difference is applied to the combination. If the capacitor that is equivalent to the combination has the same potential difference, then the charge on the equivalent capacitor is the same as:

A. the charge on C1


Homework Equations



q = CV
1/Ceq = sum ( 1/Ci )

The Attempt at a Solution



Well the answer is given, but I don't understand it. I keep doing the problem according to the formulas, but I get q1*q2 / q1+q2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that does not look right. I think the place where you are going wrong is maybe you are thinking that q_1=C_1 V. (This is not true because C1 does not have the full battery voltage V across it--part of it is across C1 and part across C2.) What is true is that q_1 = C_1 V_1.

So what is the charge on the equivalent capacitance in terms of C1,C2, and V?

Once you have that, you can find the charge on C1 by itself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top