Why is the curl of the electric dipole moment equal to zero in the far field?

Krikri
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello.Looking at Jackson's ch 9 on radiation, I am trying to calculate the fields E and B from the potentials in the far field but it is very confusing. Given now the approximation for he vector potential

\textbf{A}_{\omega}(x) = -ik \frac{e^{ikr}}{r} \textbf{P}_{\omega}

with \textbf{P}_{\omega} = \int{d^{3}x^{\prime} \textbf{x}^{\prime} \rho_{\omega} (\textbf{x}^{\prime})} the electric dipole moment. The fields are the calculated from

\textbf{B}_{\omega}(x) = \nabla\times\textbf{A}_{\omega}(x) and \textbf{E}_{\omega}(x)= \frac{i}{k}\nabla\times\textbf{B}_{\omega}(x)
So first I tried to computed the B fiels and I get to an expression like

\textbf{B}_{\omega}(x) = \Big[k^2 \frac{e^{ikr}}{r} + ik\frac{e^{ikr}}{r^2}\Big](\hat{n}\times\textbf{P}_{\omega} ) + \Big[-ik\frac{e^{ikr}}{r} (\nabla\times\textbf{P}_{\omega})\Big]

and it seems that \nabla\times\textbf{P}_{\omega} =0 but I am not sute why exactly. I think maybe that the dipole is calculated at the prime coordinates and so the curl is with respect to the not prime coordinates so maybe that's why. Also I am confused on how to proceed with the calculations for the E field \textbf{E}_{\omega}(x)= \frac{i}{k} \Big[\big(k^3\frac{e^{ikr}}{r} - k^2\frac{e^ikr}{r^2}\big)[\hat{n}\times(\hat{n}\times\textbf{P}_{\omega})] + k^2\frac{e^{ikr}}{r} \nabla\times(\hat{n}\times\textbf{P}_{\omega})\Big]

I believe the second term must vanish as i suspect from the result but don't why again. Also the dipole moment which direction has?

I tried to investigate the second term using the vector identity relevant here so

\nabla\times(\hat{n}\times\textbf{P}_{\omega}) =\hat{n}(\nabla\cdot\textbf{P}_{\omega}) - \textbf{P}_{\omega}(\nabla\cdot\hat{n}) + (\textbf{P}_{\omega}\cdot\nabla)\hat{n}- (\hat{n}\cdot\nabla)\textbf{P}_{\omega}

Is this thing zero and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All the vector operations on ## P_{\omega} ## are zero because ## P_{\omega} ## is just a constant. The vector operations on ## \hat{n} ## I think need a little consideration, but I think ## \hat{n}=1\hat{a_r} ## in spherical coordinates. You can google the operations of curl and divergence in spherical coordinates. I think the curl vanishes, but not the divergence. The ## P_{\omega}\cdot \nabla \hat{n} ## term also needs to be carefully evaluated. I think this last term is zero because the "1" in front of ## \hat{a_r} ## is a constant. ## \\ ## Just an additional comment: I think the first equation for ## A_{\omega} ## comes from the polarization current formula ## J_p=\dot{P} ## along with ## A(x)=\int {\frac{J(x')}{c|x-x'|} } \, d^3x' ##. (My formula for ## A ## may be a steady state formula, so I may need to do some further reading on the subject). ## \ ## In the ## x' ## integral, the sinusoidal dipole is assumed to be localized near the origin.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top