Why is the direction of temperature gradient important in thermal conductivity?

AI Thread Summary
The direction of the temperature gradient in thermal conductivity is crucial because it indicates the flow of heat from hotter to cooler areas. The sign of the temperature gradient (dθ/dx) is not physically significant; it depends on the chosen reference point. Regardless of whether the calculation uses the larger or smaller temperature value first, the gradient will always reflect that temperature decreases with distance from the hot end. This consistent approach ensures clarity in understanding heat transfer. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate thermal conductivity analysis.
Ronaldo95163
Messages
77
Reaction score
1
I'm doing Thermal conductivity and I'm kinda confused on something wrt to the temperature gradient...why is it that ΔΘ in the first case the smaller value minus the larger but in the second example it's the larger minus the smaller?
 

Attachments

  • thermal.jpg
    thermal.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 382
Physics news on Phys.org
Ronaldo95163 said:
I'm doing Thermal conductivity and I'm kinda confused on something wrt to the temperature gradient...why is it that ΔΘ in the first case the smaller value minus the larger but in the second example it's the larger minus the smaller?
Whether dθ/dx is positive or negative has no physical significance. Heat flow is always from hotter to cooler. The sign depends on where you put the origin and where the hot end is in relation to the origin.

AM
 
Oh cool
So For the first example it wouldn't have mattered if 120-0 was used instead then?
 
Ronaldo95163 said:
Oh cool
So For the first example it wouldn't have mattered if 120-0 was used instead then?
If the hot end is at the origin (x=0) and the cool end at x=20cm then:

dθ/dx = Δθ/Δx = (0-120)/(20-0) = -6°/cm

If the cool end is at the origin (x=0) and the hot end at x=20cm then:

dθ/dx = Δθ/Δx = (120-0)/(20-0) = 6°/cm

The gradient from hot to cold is always negative: i.e. temperature decreases with distance from the hot end.

AM
 
Thanks a lot man :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top