Why Is the Electric Displacement Field Important in Understanding Capacitors?

AI Thread Summary
The electric displacement field is crucial for understanding capacitors because it addresses the flow of displacement current during charging and discharging, which allows Kirchhoff's first rule to hold true. In a capacitor, while no current flows through the dielectric, a displacement current is considered to flow, ensuring continuity in the circuit. This displacement current is defined by the rate of change of the electric displacement field, linking it to the capacitor's voltage change over time. The concept is integral to Maxwell's equations, particularly in the context of the Ampère-Maxwell law. Understanding this field enhances comprehension of how capacitors function in electrical circuits.
Vanush
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Can someone please post a problem/situation outlining the motivation / usefulness of the electric displacement field? (Particularly with a capacitor) I'm having trouble understanding the concept and information is sparse on the internet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vanush said:
Can someone please post a problem/situation outlining the motivation / usefulness of the electric displacement field? (Particularly with a capacitor) I'm having trouble understanding the concept and information is sparse on the internet.

Hi Vanush! :smile:

For electric displacement field in a capacitor, this (from the PF Library) may help:

Displacement current:

No current ever flows through a functioning capacitor.

But while a capacitor is charging or discharging (that is, neither at zero nor maximum charge), current is flowing round the circuit joining the plates externally, and so there would be a breach of Kirchhoff's first rule (current in = current out at any point) at each plate, if only ordinary current were used, since there is ordinary current in the circuit on one side of the plate, but not in the dielectric on the other side.

Accordingly, a displacement current is deemed to flow through the capacitor, restoring the validity of Kirchhoff's first rule:

I\ =\ C\frac{dV}{dt}

and this linear displacement current I (which might better be called the flux current or free flux current) is the rate of change of the flux (field strength times area) of the electric displacement field D:

I\ =\ A\,\widehat{\bold{n}}\cdot\frac{\partial\bold{D}}{\partial t}\ =\ A\,\frac{\partial D}{\partial t}\ =\ C\frac{dV}{dt}

which appears in the Ampére-Maxwell law (one of Maxwell's equations in the free version):

\nabla\,\times\,\bold{H}\ =\ \bold{J}_f\ +\ \frac{\partial\bold{D}}{\partial t}

Note that the displacement alluded to in the displacement current across a capacitor is of free charge, and is non-local, since it alludes to charge being displaced from one plate to the other, which is a substantial distance compared with the local displacement of bound charge in, for example, the presence of a polarisation field.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top