Why Is the Electric Field Not Zero Inside the Spherical Cavity?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field at a point 2.0 cm from the center of a spherical cavity is not zero due to the presence of a point charge at the cavity's center. Although this point is within the metal conductor, the charge inside the cavity creates an electric field that cannot be nullified by the conductor's properties. According to Gauss' law, a Gaussian surface enclosing the point charge will have a non-zero electric field, as it contains enclosed charge. The conductor's surfaces will redistribute charge to balance the field, but the field inside the cavity remains influenced by the central charge. Thus, the electric field is determined to be 1.44e8, confirming the influence of the point charge.
SupremeV
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spherical cavity of radius 4.50 cm is at the center of a metal sphere of radius 18.0 cm. A point charge Q = 6.40 µC rests at the very center of the cavity, whereas the metal conductor carries no net charge. Determine the electric field at the following points.
(a) 2.0 cm from the center of the cavity


Homework Equations



integral of ( E * dA ) = (1/Epsilon o) * Q enc
E = k q / r2

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer, is suppose to 1.44e8, and has a very straightforward use of E = k q / r2.

My question is why isn't the electric field 0 at 2.0 cm from the center at the cavity. Isn't that inside the static metal conductor, hence must be 0.

Thanks all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SupremeV said:

Homework Statement



A spherical cavity of radius 4.50 cm is at the center of a metal sphere of radius 18.0 cm. A point charge Q = 6.40 µC rests at the very center of the cavity, whereas the metal conductor carries no net charge. Determine the electric field at the following points.
(a) 2.0 cm from the center of the cavity


Homework Equations



integral of ( E * dA ) = (1/Epsilon o) * Q enc
E = k q / r2

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer, is suppose to 1.44e8, and has a very straightforward use of E = k q / r2.

My question is why isn't the electric field 0 at 2.0 cm from the center at the cavity. Isn't that inside the static metal conductor, hence must be 0.
The short answer is: because Gauss' law would be violated if the field was 0. For a concentric Gaussian shell of radius 2 cm, the enclosed charge is not 0. So the field at the surface of that shell cannot be 0.

You may be confusing a situation in which you are to determine the field inside a charged sphere, with no charge inside the spherical cavity. In that case, there would be no enclosed charge (all the charge would be outside a Gaussian sphere of radius 2 cm) so the field would be 0.

AM
 
Hi SupremeV :biggrin:

(Have an epsilon and integral: ε, ∫ and try using X2 and X2 button just above the reply box --- ©Tiny-Tim)

Field is only zero inside the material of the conductor ... not the hollow space

In this case ... the two surfaces(inner and outer) of hollow sphere will get come charge so as to balance the electric field due to central charge ... in in fact this property of conductors (and gauss law) is used to find this charge.
 
Thank you! I appreciate the help!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top