Why is the expectation value of the commutator not zero in method 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alizeid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expectation value of the commutator in quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the |+45> polarized photon in the HV basis. One participant is confused about obtaining a zero expectation value for the commutator, which they believe is incorrect. Clarifications are requested regarding the definitions of operators and states, particularly the |45> state and its relation to the HV basis. There is a debate about whether the expectation value of the commutator should be zero, with some arguing it must not be, while others assert that it can be zero under certain conditions. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly defining terms and understanding the underlying principles of quantum mechanics.
alizeid
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded (again!) to use the Template when starting schoolwork threads.
I'm trying to extract the expected value of a |+45> polarized photon in the HV- base. I do it in two ways, one is correct and the other I get wrong answer. What am I doing wrong in the first method that is wrong?

method 1

ali2.jpg


method 2
ali1.jpg


thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • ali2.jpg
    ali2.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 652
  • ali1.jpg
    ali1.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 645
Physics news on Phys.org
You computed the expectation value of different operators. Where did the minus sign come from in your second method?

Also, please type out your expressions instead of attaching them as images.
 
Orodruin said:
You computed the expectation value of different operators. Where did the minus sign come from in your second method?

Also, please type out your expressions instead of attaching them as images.
why are they different operators? according to the book, they are the same
 
Then you either copied the book wrong or the book is wrong.
 
alizeid said:
why are they different operators? according to the book, they are the same
The real problem is

2.PNG


I get the expectation value of the commutator to zero, even for operator | 45>. This can not be correct. I can not solve this problem, can you help me?
 

Attachments

  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    22.3 KB · Views: 268
The problem formulation is of little use unless you define the ##|45\rangle## basis in terms of the HV one and define what is meant by ##\mathcal P_{HV}##. Since you have not told us what textbook you are using and we most likely will not have direct access to it, this is crucial information.
alizeid said:
even for operator | 45>
##|45\rangle## is a state, not an operator.
 
Orodruin said:
The problem formulation is of little use unless you define the ##|45\rangle## basis in terms of the HV one and define what is meant by ##\mathcal P_{HV}##. Since you have not told us what textbook you are using and we most likely will not have direct access to it, this is crucial information.

##|45\rangle## is a state, not an operator.

5.PNG


4.PNG
 

Attachments

  • 5.PNG
    5.PNG
    7.3 KB · Views: 231
  • 4.PNG
    4.PNG
    16.5 KB · Views: 280
So what is the problem?
 
Orodruin said:
So what is the problem?

The expectation value of the commutator should NOT be zero. the commutator do not commut therefore the answer is wrong
 
  • #10
alizeid said:
The expectation value of the commutator should NOT be zero. the commutator do not commut therefore the answer is wrong
No it isn’t. In fact, the expectation of the commutator must be zero for the given state! Anything else would violate the uncertainty relation.
 
Back
Top