Why is the focal length for red light closest to that of white light in a lens?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StonieJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aberration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the focal lengths of lenses for different light colors, particularly why red light's focal length is closest to that of white light. The lens-maker's equation indicates that the focal length is influenced by the index of refraction, which varies with light wavelength. Red light has a lower index of refraction compared to blue light, resulting in less bending and a focal length that is more similar to white light. The user seeks clarification on whether the question is about the proximity of red light's focal length to white light or if it encompasses a broader comparison among colors. Ultimately, the data shows that red light's focal length (15.7 cm) is indeed very close to that of white light (15.9 cm).
StonieJ
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Essentially, I'm curious as to why the focal length of a lens with red light is the closest to the focal length in white light.

MY ATTEMPTED ANSWER:

According to the lens-maker's equation, the focal length of a lens depends on the index of refraction of the lens material, which in turn is dependent upon the wavelength of the light being used. By observing the dispersion curve for a given lens, one can see that as the wavelengths get longer (towards red), the dispersion curve levels off (gets less negatively steep), indicating that the index of refraction for red is small and therefore red light is not highly bent as it passes through the lens. Blue light, on the other hand, has a high index of refraction and is focused to a point in front of the red light focal length.

Does that look right up to this point? I hope so, but I still don't feel like I'm answering the fundamental question of why red light is closest to white light. I'm just describing why it is refracted less than blue light (and I may not even be doing a good job of that). If white light contains both red and blue, then why does it more closely resemble that of red, and not something in between the two?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NO one said red light is the closest to the white light, Who told you that?

this is the one of the best refractor's color curve, take a look
http://www.astro-physics.com/products/telescopes/160edf/160colorcurve3.jpg
 
Perhaps I misstated what I was asking about.

Here is the actual question:

"Compare the focal lengths of lens B (focal length 16.0 +/- 0.2 cm) for white, red, green, and blue light. For which of the three colors is the focal length more nearly the same as for white light? Explain."


My data is:
white = 15.9 cm
red = 15.7 cm
green = 15.6 cm
blue = 15.2 cm

Maybe by "explain" they don't mean "tell us why the focal length for red light is closest to white light" but that's the impression I got.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top