Why is the Force on the Wire Directed from Stronger to Weaker Field?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Force Wire
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the direction of the force on a wire placed in a magnetic field, specifically why the force is directed from a stronger magnetic field to a weaker one. Participants also explore the implications of Newton's third law in this context, particularly regarding the forces exerted on the wire and the magnet.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the force on the wire is directed from the stronger to the weaker field, suggesting it could be the opposite.
  • Another participant explains that the force on the wire is due to the current running through it and provides a mathematical expression for the force per unit volume.
  • A participant expresses confusion over the notation used in the mathematical explanation and clarifies their understanding of the "unbalanced field" concept.
  • Some participants propose that the magnetic force arises from the interaction between the magnetic field of the magnet and the field produced by the current in the wire.
  • One participant argues that two magnetic fields do not interact in classical electrodynamics, stating that the total field is a sum of the individual fields.
  • There is a discussion about Newton's third law, with participants noting that the wire exerts a force on the magnet, leading to questions about the nature of these forces.
  • Another participant introduces an energy perspective, suggesting that moving the wire towards the weaker field reduces energy more significantly than it increases energy in the weaker field.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of forces on the magnets, questioning whether the forces are equal and opposite or if they could lead to a reactionless drive.
  • A participant provides a mathematical expression for the force on the magnet due to the wire, noting the complexity due to the nature of permanent magnets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the direction of the force on the wire and the implications of Newton's third law. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the interaction of magnetic fields and the definitions of terms like "unbalanced field." Some mathematical steps and notations are also unclear to certain participants.

songoku
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
394
1602850831859.png


I understand how the weaker and stronger field occurs but I don't understand why the force on the wire is directed from stronger to weaker field. I mean why not from weaker to stronger?

I also want to ask about Newton's 3rd law in this case. Newton's 3rd law states that for every action there will be equal and opposite reaction. So let say the force on wire in the picture as "action", what will be the "reaction"? The force on the wire is due to the (unbalanced) field so the "reaction" will be the force on (unbalanced) field by the wire?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on the wire is due to the current running through it. If you make the field of the magnet ##\vec{B}=B \vec{e}_x## then ##\vec{j}=-j \vec{e}_z## and the force per unit volume of the wire is ##\vec{f}=\vec{j} \times \vec{B}=-j B \vec{e}_y##. I don't know, what this has to do with an "unbalanced field" (whatever this might be).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and etotheipi
I am really sorry, I don't understand the notation used.

vanhees71 said:
The force on the wire is due to the current running through it. If you make the field of the magnet ##\vec{B}=B \vec{e}_x## then ##\vec{j}=-j \vec{e}_z##

Do you mean ##\vec{B}## is the magnetic field of the magnet (which is to the right based on the picture)?

And what is ##\vec{j}## ?

I don't know, what this has to do with an "unbalanced field" (whatever this might be).
By unbalanced field, I mean there is stronger and weaker region of magnetic field (in picture (b)).

I was taught that the magnetic force occurs due to interaction between 2 magnetic fields, one is from the magnet and one is produced by the current flowing through the wire. This interaction will create unbalanced field, one region is stronger (upper part of wire in picture (b) ) and one region is weaker (lower part of wire in picture (b) ). This stronger and weaker field will give rise to magnetic force acting on the wire, which is directed from stronger field to weaker field (downwards based on picture (b) )

Thanks
 
Two magnetic fields do not interact (in classical electrodynamics). The total field is just the sum of the fields of the permanent magnet (which I assumed to be approximately constant as given in the picture) and the field due to the current through the wire, and ##\vec{j}## is the current density in the wire. The total force is
$$\vec{F}=V \vec{f}=-A l j B \vec{e}_y=-l I B \vec{e}_y,$$
where ##l## is the length of the wire and ##A## its cross-sectional area.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and etotheipi
songoku said:
I also want to ask about Newton's 3rd law in this case. Newton's 3rd law states that for every action there will be equal and opposite reaction. So let say the force on wire in the picture as "action", what will be the "reaction"?

The wire also exerts a force on the magnet!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku, berkeman and vanhees71
songoku said:
I understand how the weaker and stronger field occurs but I don't understand why the force on the wire is directed from stronger to weaker field. I mean why not from weaker to stronger?
You can think of this in terms of energy. The energy in the field is proportional to the square of the B field. If the wire moves in the direction of the weaker field then that will increase the weak field and decrease the strong field. Because the energy is proportional to the square of the field the energy reduction of the strong field will be larger than the energy increase of the weak field. This implies a force in that direction which can be used to do work equal to the net reduction in energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and vanhees71
etotheipi said:
The wire also exerts a force on the magnet!
Let say the force on the wire is F, so there will be upwards force of magnitude F on right magnet and there will also be upwards force of magnitude F on left magnet?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Let say the force on the wire is F, so there will be upwards force of magnitude F on right magnet and there will also be upwards force of magnitude F on left magnet?
If there were then you would have a reactionless drive. So no.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Dale said:
If there were then you would have a reactionless drive. So no.
Or maybe the force on left and right magnet should be F/2 upwards for each?

Thanks
 
  • #10
Of course, there's a force on the magnet by the wire. You can calculate it in the same way as for the force on the wire by the magnet. It's only not so straight forward, because you don't have an obvious current density here, because it's a permanent magnet.

For this you can show that the force is given by
$$\vec{F}_{\text{mag}}=\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 x \vec{\nabla} (\vec{M} \cdot \vec{B}_{\text{wire}}),$$
where the integral is over the volume of the magnet and ##\vec{M}## is the magnetic-dipole density within the magnet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and etotheipi
  • #11
Thank you very much vanhees71, etotheipi, Dale
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
993
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K